Assessing the utility of marine filter feeders for environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity monitoring
- PMID: 36598115
- DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13754
Assessing the utility of marine filter feeders for environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity monitoring
Abstract
Aquatic environmental DNA (eDNA) surveys are transforming how marine ecosystems are monitored. The time-consuming preprocessing step of active filtration, however, remains a bottleneck. Hence, new approaches that eliminate the need for active filtration are required. Filter-feeding invertebrates have been proven to collect eDNA, but side-by-side comparative studies to investigate the similarity between aquatic and filter-feeder eDNA signals are essential. Here, we investigated the differences among four eDNA sources (water; bivalve gill-tissue; sponges; and ethanol in which filter-feeding organisms were stored) along a vertically stratified transect in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand using three metabarcoding primer sets targeting fish and vertebrates. Combined, eDNA sources detected 59 vertebrates, while concurrent diver surveys observed eight fish species. There were no significant differences in alpha and beta diversity between water and sponge eDNA and both sources were highly correlated. Vertebrate eDNA was successfully extracted from the ethanol in which sponges were stored, although a reduced number of species were detected. Bivalve gill-tissue dissections, on the other hand, failed to reliably detect eDNA. Overall, our results show that vertebrate eDNA signals obtained from water samples and marine sponges are highly concordant. The strong similarity in eDNA signals demonstrates the potential of marine sponges as an additional tool for eDNA-based marine biodiversity surveys, by enabling the incorporation of larger sample numbers in eDNA surveys, reducing plastic waste, simplifying sample collection, and as a cost-efficient alternative. However, we note the importance to not detrimentally impact marine communities by, for example, nonlethal subsampling, specimen cloning, or using bycatch specimens.
Keywords: ethanol eDNA extraction; filter-feeding organisms; marine biodiversity monitoring; metabarcoding; passive filtration; vertical spatial resolution.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Afzali, S. F., Bourdages, H., Laporte, M., Mérot, C., Normandeau, E., Audet, C., & Bernatchez, L. (2020). Comparing environmental metabarcoding and trawling survey of demersal fish communities in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada. Environmental DNA, 3(1), 22-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.111
-
- Ashby, R. (2019). The development and implementation of genomic tools for the New Zealand Greenshell Mussel industry. (Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy). University of Otago. http://hdl.handle.net/10523/9791
-
- Ayling, T. (1987). Collins guide to the sea fishes of New Zealand / by Tony Ayling; with 48 colour plates by Geoffrey J. cox and 475 line drawings by the author. Collins.
-
- Barker, M. F., & Russell, M. P. (2008). The distribution and behaviour of Patiriella mortenseni and P. regularis in the extreme hyposaline conditions of the southern New Zealand fiords. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 355(1), 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2007.12.001
-
- Barthel, D., & Theede, H. (1986). A new method for the culture of marine sponges and its application for experimental studies. Ophelia, 25(2), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00785326.1986.10429715
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources