Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan-Dec:37:3946320221144565.
doi: 10.1177/03946320221144565.

Potential diagnostic role of circulating MiRNAs in colorectal cancer

Affiliations

Potential diagnostic role of circulating MiRNAs in colorectal cancer

Dina A Abo-Elela et al. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2023 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common and fourth most deadly cancer worldwide despite its various screening method. Thus, the search for novel and better markers is continuous. This study aimed to assess the combined expression levels of miR-133a, miR-574-3p, and miR-27a in early diagnosis of colorectal cancer in comparison to traditional tumor markers (CEA and CA19.9).

Methods: miR-133a, miR-574-3p, and miR-27a were assessed in sera of 120 participants categorized into healthy control group (n = 20), benign group (n = 30) and malignant group (n = 70) using real-time PCR.

Results: miR-133a, miR-574-3p, and miR-27a expressions showed significant difference among different staging, grading and tumor size of CRC. The sensitivities of the three miRNAs whether combined or individually used were better than routinely used tumor markers (CEA and CA19.9) leading to more accurate and faster diagnosis of CRC.

Conclusion: Synergetic detection of miRNA-133a, miRNA-574-3p, and miRNA-27a may serve as better noninvasive biomarkers with higher combined sensitivity for early diagnosis of CRC than individual detection of miRNAs.

Keywords: Colorectal cancer; miR-133a; miR-574-3p; miR27a.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure
1.
Figure 1.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for tumor marker (a) CA19.9 (b) CEA. The best cutoff values were 11.5 U/ml for CA19.9 and 5.5 ng/mL for CEA with AUC (95% CI) 0.736 (0.639–0.834) and 0.88 (0.814–0.946) for CA19.9 and CEA, respectively, at p < .05.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for (a) miR-133a (b) miR-574-3p, (c) miR-27a. The best cutoff values were 36.5-, 46.5-, and 18.5-fold change for miR-133a, miR-574-3p, and miR-27a, respectively, with AUC (95% CI) 0.974 (0.948–1.000) for miR-133a, 0.975 (.948–1.000) for miR-574-3p and 0.904 (0.849–0.958) for miR-27a at p < .05.

References

    1. Zhang N, Hu X, Du Y, et al. (2021) The role of miRNAs in colorectal cancer progression and chemoradiotherapy. Biomed Pharmacother 134: 111099. - PubMed
    1. Hassan AM, Khalaf AM, Elias AAK. (2021) Colorectal cancer in egypt: clinical, life-style, and socio-demographic risk factors. Al-Azhar International Medical Journal 2(9): 6–15.
    1. Thanikachalam K, Khan G. (2019) Colorectal cancer and nutrition. Nutrients 11(1): 164. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shin VY, Chu KM. (2014) MiRNA as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 20(30): 10432–10439. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Syeda ZA, Langden SSS, Munkhzul C, et al. (2020) Regulatory mechanism of MicroRNA expression in cancer. Int J Mol Sci 21(5): 1723. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms