Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 1;33(1):78-89.
doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000001052. Epub 2022 Jun 24.

Biomechanical Effects of Prophylactic Knee Bracing on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk: A Systematic Review

Brian H H Tuang  1 , Zheng Qin Ng  1 , Joshua Z Li  2   3 , Dinesh Sirisena  3
Affiliations

Biomechanical Effects of Prophylactic Knee Bracing on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk: A Systematic Review

Brian H H Tuang et al. Clin J Sport Med. .

Abstract

Objective: Prophylactic knee braces (PKBs) are widely used by athletes in pivoting and landing sports and have the potential to influence knee movement and alignment, thus modulating anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk. This systematic review analyses current evidence on the biomechanical effects that PKBs have in the prevention of ACL injuries.

Data sources: The review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Searches were conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and CINAHL for studies published from inception until May 31, 2021. Included studies assessed the effects of PKBs on biomechanical variables associated with ACL injuries in landing or pivoting tasks, comparing between braced and unbraced conditions.

Main results: A total of 234 articles were identified; from which, 14 controlled, laboratory, biomechanical studies were included in this review. The effects of PKBs on knee biomechanics could be divided into kinematic variables in the coronal, sagittal, and transverse planes; and common kinetic variables, such as ground reaction force (GRF) and ACL load/strain. Also, PKBs were found to have protective effects in coronal and transverse plane kinematics, but results in the sagittal plane were inconclusive. Assessing knee kinetics, PKBs were advantageous in decreasing ACL load/strain but had no significant effect on GRF.

Conclusions: Prophylactic knee braces may serve to reduce ACL injury risk by modulating knee coronal and transverse plane movements and ACL load/strain during high-risk maneuvres. Precise recommendations are limited by study heterogeneity. More prospective studies are needed to assess ACL injury risk during high-risk sports using specific PKBs.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Majewski M, Susanne H, Klaus S. Epidemiology of athletic knee injuries: a 10-year study. Knee. 2006;13:184–188.
    1. Shimokochi Y, Shultz SJ. Mechanisms of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Athl Train. 2008;43:396–408.
    1. Wang N, Zhu Z, Wu Z, et al. Comparative risk-benefit profiles of different femoral drilling techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99:e20544.
    1. Joseph AM, Collins CL, Henke NM, et al. A multisport epidemiologic comparison of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in high school athletics. J Athl Train. 2013;48:810–817.
    1. Renström PA. Eight clinical conundrums relating to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in sport: recent evidence and a personal reflection. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47:367–372.

Publication types