Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 3;14(12):e32158.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.32158. eCollection 2022 Dec.

Septic Shock: Management and Outcomes

Affiliations
Review

Septic Shock: Management and Outcomes

Nojood Basodan et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

The incidence rates of sepsis and septic shock as a complication have become more common over the past several decades. With this increase, sepsis remains the most common cause of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and one of the most mortality factors, with a huge burden on healthcare facilities. Septic shock has devastating consequences on patients' lives, including organ failures and other long-term complications. Due to its dynamic clinical presentations, guidelines and tools have been established to improve the diagnosis and management effectively. However, there is still a need for evidence-based standardized procedures for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of sepsis and septic shock patients due to the inconsistency of current guidelines and studies contrasting with each other. The standardization would help physicians better manage sepsis, minimize complications and reduce mortality. Septic shock is usually challenging to manage due to its variety of clinical characteristics and physiologic dynamics, affecting the outcomes. Therefore, this review presented the available data in the literature on septic shock diagnosis, management, and prognosis to have an overview of the updated best practice approach to septic shock.

Keywords: diagnosis; guidelines; management; sepsis; septic shock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Sepsis and septic shock: New definitions, new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Esposito S, De Simone G, Boccia G, De Caro F, Pagliano P. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2017;10:204–212. - PubMed
    1. Mahapatra S, Heffne AC. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Septic Shock. - PubMed
    1. Hospitalizations, costs, and outcomes of severe sepsis in the United States 2003 to 2007. Lagu T, Rothberg MB, Shieh MS, Pekow PS, Steingrub JS, Lindenauer PK. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:754–761. - PubMed
    1. Reducing the global burden of sepsis. Dugani S, Veillard J, Kissoon N. CMAJ. 2017;189:0–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, et al. Lancet. 2020;395:200–211. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources