Efficacy, safety, and cost of mobilization strategies in multiple myeloma: a prospective, observational study
- PMID: 36601982
- PMCID: PMC10388259
- DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2022.282269
Efficacy, safety, and cost of mobilization strategies in multiple myeloma: a prospective, observational study
Figures
References
-
- Gay F, Musto P, Rota-Scalabrini D, et al. . Carfilzomib with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone or lenalidomide and dexamethasone plus autologous transplantation or carfilzomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, followed by maintenance with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide or lenalidomide alone for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (FORTE): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(12):1705-1720 - PubMed
-
- Wood WA, Whitley J, Moore D, et al. . Chemomobilization with etoposide is highly effective in patients with multiple myeloma and overcomes the effects of age and prior therapy. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;17(1):141-146. - PubMed
-
- Dhakal B, Veltri LW, Fenske TS, et al. . Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide chemotherapy versus plerixafor-based strategies in patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22(10):1773-1780. - PubMed
-
- DiPersio JF, Stadtmauer EA, Nademanee A, et al. . Plerixafor and G-CSF versus placebo and G-CSF to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2009;113(23):5720-5726. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
