A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty
- PMID: 36604609
- PMCID: PMC9813451
- DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-03727-2
A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty
Abstract
Background: Integrated care may improve outcomes for older people living with frailty. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a new, anticipatory, multidisciplinary care service in improving the wellbeing and quality of life (QoL) of older people living with severe frailty.
Methods: A community-based non-randomised controlled study. Participants (≥65 years, electronic Frailty Index ≥0.36) received either the new integrated care service plus usual care, or usual care alone. Data collection was at three time points: baseline, 2-4 weeks, and 10-14 weeks. The primary outcome was patient wellbeing (symptoms and other concerns) at 2-4 weeks, measured using the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS); the secondary outcome was QoL, measured using EQ-5D-5L. To test duration of effect and safety, wellbeing and QoL were also measured at 10-14 weeks. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise and compare intervention and control groups (eligible but had not accessed the new service), with t-test, Chi-Square, or Mann-Whitney U tests (as appropriate) to test differences at each time point. Generalised linear modelling, with propensity score matching, was used for further group comparisons. Data were analysed using STATA v17.
Results: 199 intervention and 54 control participants were recruited. At baseline, intervention and control groups were similar in age, gender, ethnicity, living status, and body mass index, but not functional status or area deprivation score. At 2-4 weeks, wellbeing had improved in the intervention group but worsened in the control (median IPOS -5 versus 2, p<0.001). QoL improved in the intervention group but was unchanged in the control (median EQ-5D-5L 0.12, versus 0.00, p<0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, and living status, the intervention group had an average total IPOS score reduction at 2-4 weeks of 6.34 (95% CI: -9.01: -4.26, p<0.05); this improvement was sustained, with an average total IPOS score reduction at 10-14 weeks of 6.36 (95% CI: -8.91:-3.80, p<0.05). After propensity score matching based on functional status/area deprivation, modelling showed similar results, with a reduction in IPOS score at 2-4 weeks in the intervention group of 7.88 (95% CI: -12.80: -2.96, p<0.001).
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the new, anticipatory, multidisciplinary care service may have improved the overall wellbeing and quality of life of older people living with frailty at 2-4 weeks and the improvement in wellbeing was sustained at three months.
Ethics approval: NHS Research Ethics Committee 18/YH/0470 and IRAS-250981.
Trial registration: The trial was retrospectively registered at the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) registry (registration date: 01/08/2022, registration number: ISRCTN10613839).
Keywords: Frailty; Integrated care; Multidisciplinary team; Older people; Proactive care; Quality of life; Wellbeing.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
Similar articles
-
Study protocol for The GOAL Trial: comprehensive geriatric assessment for frail older people with chronic kidney disease to increase attainment of patient-identified goals-a cluster randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2023 May 30;24(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07363-4. Trials. 2023. PMID: 37254217 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of a pro-active integrated care intervention for frail community-dwelling older people: a quasi-experimental study with the GP-practice as single entry point.BMC Geriatr. 2016 Feb 15;16:43. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0214-5. BMC Geriatr. 2016. PMID: 26879893 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of a Proactive Primary Care Program for Frail Older People: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):1029-1036.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.023. Epub 2017 Aug 8. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017. PMID: 28801235 Clinical Trial.
-
The impact of interventions on management of frailty in hospitalized frail older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Geriatr. 2020 Dec 3;20(1):526. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01935-8. BMC Geriatr. 2020. PMID: 33272208 Free PMC article.
-
What are the priorities for research of older people living in their own home, including those living with frailty? A systematic review and content analysis of studies reporting older people's priorities and unmet needs.Age Ageing. 2024 Jan 2;53(1):afad232. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad232. Age Ageing. 2024. PMID: 38243402 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Digital Health for Equitable Rheumatic Care: Integrating Real-World Experiences to Guide Policy Pathways.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 18;13(4):438. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13040438. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39997313 Free PMC article. Review.
-
"I'm living in a 'no' world now…"- A qualitative study of the widespread impact of living with chronic breathlessness, and experiences of identification and assessment of this symptom in an older, frail community-based population.NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2025 Jan 24;35(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41533-024-00409-3. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2025. PMID: 39856090 Free PMC article.
-
Experiences of a Novel Integrated Service for Older Adults at Risk of Frailty: A Qualitative Study.J Patient Exp. 2023 Sep 5;10:23743735231199827. doi: 10.1177/23743735231199827. eCollection 2023. J Patient Exp. 2023. PMID: 37693187 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources