Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Jan 6;23(1):14.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04499-6.

Delivering the Thinking Healthy Programme as a universal group intervention integrated into routine antenatal care: a randomized-controlled pilot study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Delivering the Thinking Healthy Programme as a universal group intervention integrated into routine antenatal care: a randomized-controlled pilot study

Perran Boran et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Women with perinatal depression and their children are at increased risk of poor health outcomes. There is a need to implement non-stigmatizing interventions into existing health systems which reduce psychosocial distress during pregnancy and prevent perinatal depression. We adapted the WHO-endorsed Thinking Healthy Programme (THP) to be delivered universally to all women attending routine online pregnancy schools in Istanbul, Turkey. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of this intervention.

Methods: This mixed-methods study incorporated a two-arm pilot randomized controlled trial and qualitative evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of the adapted THP - Brief Group version (THP-BGV) to a range of stakeholders. We recruited pregnant women at 12-30 weeks' gestation through pregnancy schools within the University Hospital's catchment area. Women in the intervention arm received five online sessions of the THP-BGV delivered by antenatal nurses. The intervention employed principles of cognitive behaviour therapy to provide psychoeducation, behaviour activation, problem-solving strategies and group support to participants. In the control arm, women received usual care consisting of routine online educational pregnancy classes aided by the antenatal nurses. The women were assessed for depressive symptoms with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale at baseline and 4-6 weeks post-intervention and also evaluated for anxiety, perceived social support, partner relationship, level of disability and sleep quality. In-depth interviews were conducted with women and other key stakeholders.

Results: Of the 99 consecutive women referred to the pregnancy schools, 91 (91.9%) were eligible and 88 (88.8%) consented to participate in the study and were randomized. Eighty-two (83%) completed the final assessments. Our main findings were that this preventive group intervention was feasible to be integrated into routine antenatal educational classes and it was valued by the women and delivery-agents. While the study was not powered to detect differences between intervention and control conditions, we found small trends towards reduction in anxiety and depressive symptoms favoring the intervention arm. No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: Given the paucity of preventive interventions for perinatal depression in low and middle-income countries, a fully powered definitive randomized controlled trial of this feasible and acceptable intervention should be conducted.

Trial registration: The study was registered at Clinical Trails.gov ( NCT04819711 ) (Registration Date: 29/03/2021).

Keywords: Perinatal depression; Psychological interventions; Thinking healthy program.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant Flow Diagram. Abbreviations: THP Thinking Healthy Programme, TAU Treatment as Usual
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Outcome measures pre to postintervention. Abbreviations: THP Thinking Healthy Programme, TAU Treatment as Usual

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gelaye B, Rondon MB, Araya R, Williams MA. Epidemiology of maternal depression, risk factors and child outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet psychiatry. 2016;3(10):973–982. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30284-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wisner KL, Sit DK, McShea MC, Rizzo DM, Zoretich RA, Hughes CL, et al. Onset timing, thoughts of self-harm, and diagnoses in postpartum women with screen-positive depression in findings. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(5):490–498. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.87. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK). The results of address-based population registration system, 2021. Release date: 4.2.2022. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=The-Results-of-Address-Based-Pop..., accessed 18.2.2022.
    1. Boran P, Waqas A, Askan ÖO, Topçu İ, Dogan T, Rahman A. Screening of postpartum depression among new mothers in Istanbul: a psychometric evaluation of the Turkish Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. BMC Research Notes. 2020;13(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05196-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rahman A, Iqbal Z, Harrington R. Life events, social support and depression in childbirth: perspectives from a rural community in the developing world. Psychol Med. 2003;33(7):1161–1167. doi: 10.1017/S0033291703008286. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data