Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 1;28(1):11-16.
doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000622. Epub 2022 Nov 1.

Brachial-femoral pulse wave velocity in 2-4-year-old children: a feasibility study

Affiliations

Brachial-femoral pulse wave velocity in 2-4-year-old children: a feasibility study

Melissa A Jones et al. Blood Press Monit. .

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) progression occurs across the lifespan. However, available measures of CVD risk in young children are limited. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) is a gold-standard, noninvasive measure of CVD risk that has been studied in children ages 6-18 years. Yet, cfPWV has been measured to a lesser extent in younger children, a population whose temperament or attention span may pose unique challenges. Brachial-femoral PWV (bfPWV) may be feasible, more acceptable, and could provide similar CVD risk assessment to cfPWV in younger children. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of bfPWV measurement in children ages 2-4 years including assessment of comparability of bfPWV to cfPWV normative data.

Methods: In 10 children (mean 2.9 ± 0.5 years), oscillometric cuffs were placed on the upper thigh and upper arm. Following a 5-min rest, cuffs were inflated to a subdiastolic pressure three times, and waveforms were captured. Procedures were repeated after a 15-min rest. Measured values were compared to age-predicted cfPWV extrapolated from published normative data in children 6-18 years of age.

Results: We successfully obtained at least one acceptable quality bfPWV scan in all participants. Among the subset with a repeated measurement ( n = 5), mean (SD) difference between measurements was 0.013 (0.28) m/s. Mean bfPWV was slightly higher than age-predicted cfPWV (observed: 4.55 m/s; predicted: 3.99 m/s; P = 0.012) with larger residuals among younger children and those not reclined in a chair during measurement.

Conclusion: bfPWV appears to be feasible tool for noninvasive CVD risk assessment in children ages 2-4 years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Age-predicted cfPWV versus Observed bfPWV by Age
Solid circles represent individual bfPWV observations in this study (n=10)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Correlations of PWV Residuals with Participant Age and Heartrate
Residuals calculated as age-predicted cfPWV-bfPWV Solid circles represent individual participants
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Repeatability of bfPWV among Participants with Two Measurements
Each line represents individual participants with two measurements of bfPWV (n=5) Measurements 1 and 2 were separated by a 15-minute break

References

    1. Kim H-L, Kim S-H. Pulse Wave Velocity in Atherosclerosis. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2019;6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Bortel LM, Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, et al. Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. Journal of Hypertension. 2012;30(3). - PubMed
    1. Stoner L, Kucharska-Newton A, Meyer ML. Cardiometabolic health and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in children: a systematic review and meta-regression. The Journal of pediatrics. 2020;218:98–105. e103. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Keehn L, Milne L, McNeill K, Chowienczyk P, Sinha MD. Measurement of pulse wave velocity in children: comparison of volumetric and tonometric sensors, brachial-femoral and carotid-femoral pathways. Journal of hypertension. 2014;32(7):1464–1469. - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Rourke MF, Pauca A, Jiang XJ. Pulse wave analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;51(6):507–522. - PMC - PubMed