Effect of pattern luminance profile on the pattern ERG in man and pigeon
- PMID: 3660650
- DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90004-6
Effect of pattern luminance profile on the pattern ERG in man and pigeon
Abstract
Pattern electroretinograms (PERGs) have been recorded in man and pigeon using phase reversing patterns. Studies were made in both species of the effect of grating spatial frequency, grating profile (sine or square) or the size of the squares of a checkerboard on the amplitude of the responses. The results obtained in the two species were similar. In general, the ratio of the amplitudes of the sine wave:square wave responses is that predicted by the Fourier fundamentals of the pattern, and is thus not determined by changes in local luminance or contrast as it is normally defined. Checks however gave larger responses than sine or square wave profile bars matched to the Fourier fundamental on the diagonal. The results are not explicable in terms of any single stimulus parameter and suggest that the PERG generator has a degree of center/surround organisation similar to retinal ganglion cells. It is however argued that, because of the known physiological properties, generators cannot be unequivocally localised by varying the stimulus or comparing retinal, cortical and perceptual response dynamics.
Similar articles
-
Vitreal and intraretinal responses to contrast reversing patterns in the pigeon eye.Vision Res. 1983;23(5):561-72. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90132-3. Vision Res. 1983. PMID: 6880054
-
Electroretinograms evoked in man by local uniform or patterned stimulation.J Physiol. 1983 Aug;341:85-104. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014794. J Physiol. 1983. PMID: 6620193 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of pattern size on amplitude, latency and wave form of retinal and cortical potentials elicited by checkerboard pattern reversal and stimulus onset-offset.Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Jan-Feb;84(1):13-9. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90063-h. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992. PMID: 1370399
-
The origins of luminance and pattern responses of the pattern electroretinogram.Int J Psychophysiol. 1994 May;16(2-3):219-27. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(89)90049-4. Int J Psychophysiol. 1994. PMID: 8089041 Review.
-
The pattern electroretinogram: technical aspects and clinical significance.J Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Jan;6(1):85-99. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1989. PMID: 2644303 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of spatial frequency of stimulus on focal macular ERGs in monkeys : fmacERG dependence on the spatial-frequency.Doc Ophthalmol. 2006 Sep;113(2):83-91. doi: 10.1007/s10633-006-9017-x. Epub 2006 Sep 20. Doc Ophthalmol. 2006. PMID: 17028912
-
Fundamental differences between the nonlinearities of pattern and focal electroretinograms.Doc Ophthalmol. 1990 Nov;76(1):13-25. doi: 10.1007/BF00140494. Doc Ophthalmol. 1990. PMID: 2078980
-
Human electroretinal responses to grating patterns and defocus changes by global flash multifocal electroretinogram.PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0123480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123480. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25874564 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the uniform-field electroretinogram and the pattern electroretinogram to checkerboard and bar gratings.Doc Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb;140(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s10633-019-09714-6. Epub 2019 Sep 23. Doc Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 31549345
-
Check size tuning of the pattern electroretingoram: a reappraisal.Doc Ophthalmol. 1996-1997;92(3):193-202. doi: 10.1007/BF02583290. Doc Ophthalmol. 1996. PMID: 9181346
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources