Clinimetric properties of the diagnostic criteria for psychosomatic research among the elderly
- PMID: 36607260
- DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2822
Clinimetric properties of the diagnostic criteria for psychosomatic research among the elderly
Abstract
Introduction: Among the elderly, the availability of tool assessing psychosomatic syndromes is limited. The present study aims at testing inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of the semi-structured interview for the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR-R-SSI) in the elderly of the general population.
Method: One hundred eight subjects were recruited. Participants received a clinical assessment which included the DCPR-R-SSI, the Illness Attitude Scale (IAS), the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the Psychosocial Index (PSI), the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20). Analyses of inter-rater reliability of DCPR-R-SSI and concurrent validity between DCPR-R-SSI and self-administered questionnaires were conducted.
Results: DCPR-R-SSI showed excellent inter-rater reliability with a percent of agreement of 90.7% (K Cohen: 0.856 [SE = 0.043], 95% CI: 0.77-0.94). DCPR-R demoralization showed fair concurrent validity with GDS; concurrent validity was also fair between DCPR-R Alexithymia and TAS-20, and between DCPR-R allostatic overload and PSI allostatic load, while the concurrent validity between DCPR-R Disease Phobia and IAS was moderate.
Conclusion: DCPR-R-SSI represents a reliable and valid tool to assess psychosomatic syndromes in the elderly. DCPR-R is in need of being implemented in the elderly clinical evaluation.
Keywords: DPCR; concurrent validity; elderly; inter-rater reliability; psychosomatic syndromes.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Alzheimer Association. (2014). Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 10, e47-e92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2014.02.001
-
- Andreas, S., Schulz, H., Volkert, J., Lüdemann, J., Dehoust, M., Sehner, S., Suling, A., Wegscheider, K., Ausín, B., Canuto, A., Crawford, M. J., da Ronch, C., Grassi, L., Hershkovitz, Y., Muñoz, M., Quirk, A., Rotenstein, O., Belén Santos-Olmo, A., Shalev, A., … Härter, M. (2021). Incidence and risk factors of mental disorders in the elderly: The European MentDis_ICF65+ study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 56, 551-559. https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674211025711
-
- Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D., & Taylor, G. J. (1994). The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale-I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38, 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1
-
- Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D., & Taylor, G. J. (2020). Twenty-five years with the 20-item Toronto alexithymia scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 131, 109940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.109940
-
- Bagby, R. M., Taylor, G. J., & Parker, J. D. (1994). The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale-II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(94)90006-X
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources