A 5-year follow-up of the effect of corrective surgery in young adults with idiopathic scoliosis
- PMID: 36607558
- DOI: 10.1007/s43390-023-00642-9
A 5-year follow-up of the effect of corrective surgery in young adults with idiopathic scoliosis
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine mid-long-term outcomes (5 years) following surgery for young adult idiopathic scoliosis (YAdIS).
Methods: This is a retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter adult deformity database including patients operated on idiopathic scoliosis by a single posterior approach, age at surgery between 19 and 29 (considered young adults), and 5-year follow-up. Demographic, radiographic and PROMS were analyzed preoperatively, at 2 years and at final follow-up.
Results: Forty-two patients were included. Mean preoperative major curve angle was 59.65 ± 18.94. Main coronal curve initial correction was 56.38%, with 6% loss at 5 years. From baseline to 5 years after surgery, there was improvement in all PROMs (P < 0.004)-especially self-image-, except NRS-leg pain. This improvement was present at 6 months for all PROMs except for functional outcomes (SRS-Function and ODI) in which the improvement took place between 6 months and 2 years. In the 2- to 5-year follow-up period, no significant changes were seen in any PROMs. The percentage of patients reaching MCID from baseline at 5 years was: 75% for SRS-image, 45% for SRS-pain, 47.5% for SRS-function, 51.3% for SRS-mental, 42.5% for SRS-total and 15.4% for ODI. Patients reaching PASS at 5 years were: 88.1% for SRS-image, 81% for SRS-pain, 92.9% for SRS-function, 57.1% for SRS-mental, 88.1% for SRS-total, 92.7% for ODI and 69% for NRS pain. 11 minor and 4 major complications were identified.
Conclusion: YAdIS surgery resulted in an early and significant improvement in PROMs, especially for self-image, significantly reaching MCID and PASS thresholds. These results were maintained during long-term (5-year) follow-up.
Keywords: Adult spinal deformity; Patient-reported outcome measures; Surgical decision making; Young adult idiopathic scoliosis.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.
References
-
- Bridwell KH (1999) Surgical treatment of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:2607–2616. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199912150-0000 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lim JL, Hey HWD, Kumar N et al (2020) A 10-year radiographic study comparing anterior versus posterior instrumented spinal fusion in patients with lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 45:612–620. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003331 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lonstein JE (2018) Selective thoracic fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: long-term radiographic and functional outcomes. Spine Deform 6:669–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.04.008 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Darnis A, Grobost P, Roussouly P (2021) Very long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after posterior spinal fusion with pedicular screws for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 9:441–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00217-y9 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kurra S, DeMercurio P, Lavelle WF (2022) Comparison of operative implications between adolescent and young adult idiopathic scoliosis patients from scoliosis research society mortality and morbidity database. Spine Deform. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-022-00515-7 . (Published online ahead of print, 2022 May 24) - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical