Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep 1;51(8):916-922.
doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000002129.

Pancreatic Stones and Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy: A Review of the Literature

Affiliations
Review

Pancreatic Stones and Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy: A Review of the Literature

James Gnecco et al. Pancreas. .

Abstract

Pancreatic stones are sequelae of chronic pancreatitis, resulting in poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations, and a significant economic burden. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) can be used to treat pancreatic stones and is less invasive when compared to other modalities. In this review article, we have discussed the role of ESWL in the treatment of pancreatic stones and how it differs from other modalities. Databases were searched electronically for articles discussing the treatment of pancreatic ductal stones by ESWL or other modalities. Articles discussing or comparing treatment success rates were preferentially included. An inductive approach was used to identify articles related to the treatment of pancreatic stones with ESWL throughout the review process. Although laser lithotripsy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy appear to have higher success rates, the potential for ESWL to affect clinical outcomes is substantial, especially in individuals with a higher risk for invasive procedures. The decision to perform ESWL should be considered if the outcome will substantially alter the clinical management when performed by an experienced endoscopist. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to compare ESWL and peroral pancreatic lithotripsy methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Pham A, Forsmark C. Chronic pancreatitis: review and update of etiology, risk factors, and management. F1000Res . 2018;7:F1000 Faculty Rev-607.
    1. Moole H, Jaeger A, Bechtold ML, et al. Success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in chronic calcific pancreatitis management: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Pancreas . 2016;45:651–658.
    1. Dennison AR, Garcea G. Economic burden of chronic pancreatitis and implications of total pancreatectomy and autologous islet cell transplantation. JOP. J Pancreas (Online) . 2015;16:517–526.
    1. Pezzilli R, Bini L, Fantini L, et al. Quality of life in chronic pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol . 2006;12:6249–6251.
    1. Haraldsson S, Roug S, Nøjgaard C, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic duct stones: an observational study. Scand J Gastroenterol . 2018;53:1399–1403.

LinkOut - more resources