Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 6;18(1):e0279932.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279932. eCollection 2023.

Genome-wide association study of abdominal MRI-measured visceral fat: The multiethnic cohort adiposity phenotype study

Affiliations

Genome-wide association study of abdominal MRI-measured visceral fat: The multiethnic cohort adiposity phenotype study

Samantha A Streicher et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Few studies have explored the genetic underpinnings of intra-abdominal visceral fat deposition, which varies substantially by sex and race/ethnicity. Among 1,787 participants in the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC)-Adiposity Phenotype Study (MEC-APS), we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of the percent visceral adiposity tissue (VAT) area out of the overall abdominal area, averaged across L1-L5 (%VAT), measured by abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A genome-wide significant signal was found on chromosome 2q14.3 in the sex-combined GWAS (lead variant rs79837492: Beta per effect allele = -4.76; P = 2.62 × 10-8) and in the male-only GWAS (lead variant rs2968545: (Beta = -6.50; P = 1.09 × 10-9), and one suggestive variant was found at 13q12.11 in the female-only GWAS (rs79926925: Beta = 6.95; P = 8.15 × 10-8). The negatively associated variants were most common in European Americans (T allele of rs79837492; 5%) and African Americans (C allele of rs2968545; 5%) and not observed in Japanese Americans, whereas the positively associated variant was most common in Japanese Americans (C allele of rs79926925, 5%), which was all consistent with the racial/ethnic %VAT differences. In a validation step among UK Biobank participants (N = 23,699 of mainly British and Irish ancestry) with MRI-based VAT volume, both rs79837492 (Beta = -0.026, P = 0.019) and rs2968545 (Beta = -0.028, P = 0.010) were significantly associated in men only (n = 11,524). In the MEC-APS, the association between rs79926925 and plasma sex hormone binding globulin levels reached statistical significance in females, but not in males, with adjustment for total adiposity (Beta = -0.24; P = 0.028), on the log scale. Rs79837492 and rs2968545 are located in intron 5 of CNTNAP5, and rs79926925, in an intergenic region between GJB6 and CRYL1. These novel findings differing by sex and racial/ethnic group warrant replication in additional diverse studies with direct visceral fat measurements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exit.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Manhattan plots of SNP P-values from the visceral fat to abdominal area ratio genome-wide association study in the Multiethnic Cohort-Adiposity Phenotype Study (MEC-APS).
The Y-axis shows the negative base ten logarithm of the P-values and the X-axis shows the chromosomes. The genome-wide significance threshold, P<5x10-8, is shown in red: a) Overall (N = 17,87), b) Males (n = 878), c) Females (n = 909).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Regional plots of SNP P-values in a +/-200 kb window around rs79837429, rs2968545, and rs79926925.
The X-axis shows the chromosome and physical location (Mb), the left Y-axis shows the negative base ten logarithm of the P-values, and the right Y-axis shows recombination activity (cM/Mb) as a blue line. Positions, recombination rates, and gene annotations are according to NCBI’s build 37 (hg 19) and the 1000 Genomes Project Phase 3 multiethnic data set: a) Regional plot of rs79837429, b) Regional plot of rs2968545, c) Regional plot of rs79926925.

References

    1. Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, Sur P, Estep K, Lee A, et al. Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:13–27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614362 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, Grosse Y, Bianchini F, Straif K, et al. Body Fatness and Cancer—Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:794–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1606602 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fox CS, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, Pou KM, Maurovich-Horvat P, Liu CY, et al. Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments: association with metabolic risk factors in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2007;116:39–48. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.675355 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vega GL, Adams-Huet B, Peshock R, Willett D, Shah B, Grundy SM. Influence of body fat content and distribution on variation in metabolic risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:4459–66. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0814 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Le Marchand L, Wilkens LR, Castelfranco AM, Monroe KR, Kristal BS, Cheng I, et al. Circulating biomarker score for visceral fat and risks of incident colorectal and postmenopausal breast cancer: The Multiethnic Cohort Adiposity Phenotype Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020;29:966–73. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1469 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types