Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 6;18(1):e0280215.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280215. eCollection 2023.

An exploratory study of functional brain activation underlying response inhibition in major depressive disorder and borderline personality disorder

Affiliations

An exploratory study of functional brain activation underlying response inhibition in major depressive disorder and borderline personality disorder

Cody Cane et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Cognitive control is associated with impulsive and harmful behaviours, such as substance abuse and suicidal behaviours, as well as major depressive disorder (MDD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD). The association between MDD and BPD is partially explained by shared pathological personality traits, which may be underpinned by aspects of cognitive control, such as response inhibition. The neural basis of response inhibition in MDD and BPD is not fully understood and could illuminate factors that differentiate between the disorders and that underlie individual differences in cross-cutting pathological traits. In this study, we sought to explore the neural correlates of response inhibition in MDD and BPD, as well as the pathological personality trait domains contained in the ICD-11 personality disorder model. We measured functional brain activity underlying response inhibition on a Go/No-Go task using functional magnetic resonance imaging in 55 female participants recruited into three groups: MDD without comorbid BPD (n = 16), MDD and comorbid BPD (n = 18), and controls with neither disorder (n = 21). Whereas response-inhibition-related activation was observed bilaterally in frontoparietal cognitive control regions across groups, there were no group differences in activation or significant associations between activation in regions-of-interest and pathological personality traits. The findings highlight potential shared neurobiological substrates across diagnoses and suggest that the associations between individual differences in neural activation and pathological personality traits may be small in magnitude. Sufficiently powered studies are needed to elucidate the associations between the functional neural correlates of response inhibition and pathological personality trait domains.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Graphical depiction of the design of the Go/No-Go task.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Patterns of brain activation for No-Go>Go contrast collapsed across all participants.
X, y, z refer to MNI coordinates. Sagittal (left), Axial (center), and Horizontal (right) slice orientation, rendered on MNI152 2mm brain standard. Slice locations selected based on the top 5 brain regions from GNG analyses in Swick et al. [21]. Activation reflects significantly increased BOLD signal. Bar graph depicts signal change at the corresponding locations. Error bars are standard error. MFG = Middle Frontal Gyrus; IFG = Inferior Frontal Gyrus; IPL = Inferior Parietal Lobule; MedFG = Medial Frontal Gyrus.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Niendam TA, Laird AR, Ray KL, Dean YM, Glahn DC, Carter CS. Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience. 2012. Jun;12(2):241–68. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0083-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Motzkin JC, Baskin-Sommers A, Newman JP, Kiehl KA, Koenigs M. Neural correlates of substance abuse: reduced functional connectivity between areas underlying reward and cognitive control. Human brain mapping. 2014. Sep;35(9):4282–92. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22474 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crandall A, Allsop Y, Hanson CL. The longitudinal association between cognitive control capacities, suicidality, and depression during late adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of adolescence. 2018. Jun 1;65:167–76. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.03.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manasse SM, Forman EM, Ruocco AC, Butryn ML, Juarascio AS, Fitzpatrick KK. Do executive functioning deficits underpin binge eating disorder? A comparison of overweight women with and without binge eating pathology. International journal of eating disorders. 2015. Sep;48(6):677–83. doi: 10.1002/eat.22383 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karlsgodt KH, Bato AA, Ikuta T, Peters BD, DeRosse P, Szeszko PR, et al.. Functional activation during a cognitive control task in healthy youth specific to externalizing or internalizing behaviors. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging. 2018. Feb 1;3(2):133–40. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.09.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types