Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 6;23(1):9.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05308-4.

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of adding tranexamic acid for management of post-partum hemorrhage in the Indian public health system

Affiliations

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of adding tranexamic acid for management of post-partum hemorrhage in the Indian public health system

Beena Nitin Joshi et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is the global leading cause of maternal mortality, affecting nearly 3 to 6 percent of all women giving birth in India. The World Health Organization (WHO) has updated its guidelines to recommend the early use of intravenous (IV) tranexamic acid (TXA) in addition to standard care for all diagnosed PPH cases. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of introducing TXA for PPH management in the Indian public health system.

Methods: A decision analytic model was built using a decision tree to determine the cost-effectiveness of administering IV TXA to women experiencing PPH within 3 h of birth to existing management with uterotonics and supportive care. Using a disaggregated societal perspective, the costs and consequences for a hypothetical cohort of women experiencing PPH in public health facilities was estimated. The model was populated using probabilities, clinical parameters, and utilities from published literature, while cost parameters were largely derived from a primary economic costing study. The primary outcome of interest was the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR). Associated clinical events and net benefits were estimated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was undertaken. The budget impact was estimated for a national-level introduction.

Results: For an estimated annual cohort of 510,915 PPH cases in India, the addition of IV TXA would result in a per-patient disaggregated societal cost of INR 6607 (USD 95.15) with a discounted gain of 20.25 QALYs, as compared to a cost of INR 6486 (USD 93.41) with a discounted gain of 20.17 QALYs with standard care PPH management. At an ICUR value of INR 1470 per QALY gained (USD 21), the addition of IV TXA is cost-effective in Indian public health settings. The intervention is likely to prevent 389 maternal deaths, 177 surgeries, and 128 ICU admissions per 100,000 PPH cases. The findings are robust under uncertainty, with 94.5% of PSA simulations remaining cost-effective. A cumulative increase of 2.3% financial allocation for PPH management over five years will be incurred for TXA introduction.

Conclusions: Addition of tranexamic acid for primary PPH management, as recommended by WHO, is cost-effective in Indian public health settings. Policy guidelines, training manuals, and facility checklists should be updated to reflect this recommendation.

Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; IV TXA; Maternal mortality; Postpartum hemorrhage; Primary PPH management; Tranexamic acid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Decision tree diagram comparing intravenous Tranexamic acid (TXA) addition to standard care management for PPH
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
One-way sensitivity analysis for TXA addition versus standard care comparison
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
ICUR-QALY plane showing 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations for probabilistic sensitivity analysis
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve for comparing TXA addition versus standard care PPH treatment

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goal 3 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal3. Accessed 12 Jan 2022.
    1. World Health Organization. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. 2019.
    1. Maternal Mortality. https://www.gatesfoundation.org/goalkeepers/report/2021-report/progress-.... Accessed 12 Mar 2022.
    1. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e323–e333. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Geller SE, Koch AR, Garland CE, MacDonald EJ, Storey F, Lawton B. A global view of severe maternal morbidity: Moving beyond maternal mortality. Reprod Health. 2018;15:31–43. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0527-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed