Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 6;22(1):2.
doi: 10.1186/s12943-022-01685-8.

An exosome-based liquid biopsy signature for pre-operative identification of lymph node metastasis in patients with pathological high-risk T1 colorectal cancer

Affiliations

An exosome-based liquid biopsy signature for pre-operative identification of lymph node metastasis in patients with pathological high-risk T1 colorectal cancer

Katsuki Miyazaki et al. Mol Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: According to current guidelines, more than 70% of patients with invasive submucosal colorectal cancer (T1 CRC) undergo a radical operation with lymph node dissection, even though only ~ 10% have lymph node metastasis (LNM). Hence, there is imperative to develop biomarkers that can help robustly identify LNM-positive patients to prevent such overtreatments. Given the emerging interest in exosomal cargo as a source for biomarker development in cancer, we examined the potential of exosomal miRNAs as LNM prediction biomarkers in T1 CRC.

Methods: We analyzed 200 patients with high-risk T1 CRC from two independent cohorts, including a training (n = 58) and a validation cohort (n = 142). Cell-free and exosomal RNAs from pre-operative serum were extracted, followed by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reactions for a panel of miRNAs.

Results: A panel of four miRNAs (miR-181b, miR-193b, miR-195, and miR-411) exhibited robust ability for detecting LNM in the exosomal vs. cell-free component. We subsequently established a cell-free and exosomal combination signature, successfully validated in two independent clinical cohorts (AUC, 0.84; 95% CI 0.70-0.98). Finally, we developed a risk-stratification model by including key pathological features, which reduced the false positive rates for LNM by 76% without missing any true LNM-positive patients.

Conclusions: Our novel exosomal miRNA-based liquid biopsy signature robustly identifies T1 CRC patients at risk of LNM in a preoperative setting. This could be clinically transformative in reducing the significant overtreatment burden of this malignancy.

Keywords: Cell-free miRNA; Exosomal miRNA; Liquid biopsy; Lymph node metastasis; T1 CRC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Training of exosomal miRNAs and cell-free miRNAs in predicting lymph node metastasis from high-risk T1 CRC patients. A A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate the performance of cell-free miRNAs panel. B ROC curve analysis to evaluate the performance of the exosomal miRNAs panel. C Correlation of 4 miRNAs’ expression between exosomal component and total serum. D ROC curve analysis to evaluate the performance of exosomal and cell-free miRNAs combination panel. E Waterfall plot for modified risk score distribution in a training cohort. Cf-: cell-free, exo: exosomal, LNN: lymph node metastasis negative, LNP: lymph node metastasis positive, AUC: area under the curve
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Performance evaluation of novel combination panel and risk-stratification model in predicting lymph node metastasis from high-risk T1 CRC patients. A A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to compare the performance of the combination panel, key pathological features, and risk-stratification model in a validation cohort. B Decision curve plotting net benefit (detection of lymph node metastasis) against threshold probability. C Decision curve plotting net benefit untreated (avoidance of unnecessary operation) against threshold probability. D Comparison of overtreatment frequency between current guidelines and our risk-stratification model. NPV: negative predictive value, PPV: positive predictive value, LNN: lymph node metastasis negative, LNP: lymph node metastasis positive, AUC: area under the curve

References

    1. Ikematsu H, Yoda Y, Matsuda T, Yamaguchi Y, Hotta K, Kobayashi N, et al. Long-term outcomes after resection for submucosal invasive colorectal cancers. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(3):551–559. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.12.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim JB, Lee HS, Lee HJ, Kim J, Yang DH, Yu CS, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic versus surgical resection of superficial submucosal colorectal Cancer. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60(9):2785–2792. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3530-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van de Ven SEM, Backes Y, Hilbink M, Seerden TCJ, Kessels K, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, et al. Periprocedural adverse events after endoscopic resection of T1 colorectal carcinomas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91(1):142–52.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jayanna M, Burgess NG, Singh R, Hourigan LF, Brown GJ, Zanati SA, et al. Cost analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection vs. surgery for large laterally spreading colorectal lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(2):271–8.e1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.08.037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kandimalla R, Ozawa T, Gao F, Wang X, Goel A. Gene expression signature in surgical tissues and endoscopic biopsies identifies high-risk T1 colorectal cancers. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(8):2338–41.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.02.027. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types