Impact of smoking intensity and device cleaning on IQOS emissions: comparison with an array of cigarettes

Abstract

Significance: IQOS is a heated tobacco product that has been widely advertised by Philip Morris International (PMI) as a reduced-exposure product compared with cigarettes. Reduced exposure results from reduced emission of toxicants which could be influenced by product constituents and user behaviour. This study aims to assess the influence of user behaviour, including device cleaning and puffing parameters, on toxicant emissions from IQOS.

Methods: IQOS aerosols were generated by a smoking machine using the combination of two cleaning protocols (after 1 stick vs 20 sticks) and five puffing regimes (including standard cigarette puffing regimes and IQOS-tailored regimes). The generated aerosols were analysed by targeted methods for phenol and carbonyl quantification, and by chemical screening for the identification of unknown compounds.

Results: Puffing parameters significantly affected phenol and carbonyl emissions while device cleaning had no effect. Harsher puffing conditions like more, longer, and larger puffs yielded higher levels for most toxicant emissions. Comparing the obtained data with data reported by PMI on 50 cigarette brands smoked under different puffing regimes showed various trends for phenol and carbonyl emissions, with IQOS emissions sometimes higher than cigarettes. Also, the chemical screening resulted in the tentative identification of ~100 compounds in the IQOS aerosols (most of limited toxicity data).

Conclusion: This study showed that puffing parameters, but not device cleaning, have significant effects on carbonyl, phenol and other emissions. Data analysis highlighted the importance of comparing IQOS emissions with an array of commercial cigarettes tested under different puffing regimes before accepting reduced exposure claims.

Keywords: Addiction; Carcinogens; Harm Reduction; Non-cigarette tobacco products; Smoking topography.

Figure 1.

Study design with details of cleaning protocols (CP) and puffing regimes (PR).

Figure 2.

Schematic of the experimental setup that was used to assess IQOS emissions. The two sampling sets, S1 and S2, were conducted separately for the quantification of carbonyls and phenols, and the screening for IQOS-specific toxicants, respectively. S1 and S2 were schematically combined for simplicity.

Figure 3.

Comparison of phenol and carbonyl IQOS emissions from this work to combustible cigarette emissions under different puffing conditions from Counts et al. 2005. Data on cigarettes are shown as the minimum (min) and maximum (max) for each puffing regime.