Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;8(1):100762.
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100762. Epub 2023 Jan 5.

Comprehensive clinical and molecular characterization of claudin 18.2 expression in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer

Affiliations

Comprehensive clinical and molecular characterization of claudin 18.2 expression in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer

Y Kubota et al. ESMO Open. 2023 Feb.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: We conducted comprehensive clinical and molecular characterization of claudin 18.2 expression (CLDN18.2) in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC).

Patients and methods: Patients with advanced GC/GEJC who received systemic chemotherapy from October 2015 to December 2019 with available tumor specimens were analyzed. We evaluated clinicopathological features of CLDN18.2 expression with four molecular subtypes: mismatch repair deficient, Epstein-Barr virus-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, and others. In addition, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS), genomic alterations, and the expression of immune cell markers were assessed. Clinical outcomes of standard first- or second-line chemotherapy and subsequent anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) therapy were also investigated according to CLDN18.2 expression.

Results: Among 408 patients, CLDN18.2-positive (moderate-to-strong expression in ≥75%) was identified in 98 patients (24.0%) with almost equal distribution in the four molecular subtypes or CPS subgroups. CLDN18.2-positive was associated with Borrmann type 4, KRAS amplification, low CD16, and high CD68 expression. Overall survival with first-line chemotherapy was not significantly different between CLDN18.2-positive and -negative groups [median 18.4 versus 20.1 months; hazard ratio 1.26 (95% confidence interval 0.89-1.78); P = 0.191] regardless of stratification by PD-L1 CPS ≥5. Progression-free survival and objective response rates of first- and second-line chemotherapy, and anti-PD-1 therapy also showed no significant differences according to CLDN18.2 status.

Conclusions: CLDN18.2 expression in advanced GC/GEJC was associated with some clinical and molecular features but had no impact on treatment outcomes with chemotherapy or checkpoint inhibition. CLDN18.2-positive also had no impact on overall survival. This information could be useful to interpret the results from currently ongoing clinical trials of CLDN18.2-targeted therapies for advanced GC/GEJC and to consider a treatment strategy for CLDN18.2-positive GC/GEJC.

Keywords: Epstein–Barr virus; claudin 18.2; gastric cancer; mismatch repair deficiency; zolbetuximab.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Association between CLDN expression and molecular characteristics. CLDN, claudin; CPS, combined positive score; EBV, Epstein–Barr virus; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IHC, immunohistochemistry; MMR-D, mismatch repair deficient; MMR-P, mismatch repair proficient; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1. aCLDN+, 2+/3+ ≥75%; EGFR+, 2+/3+ ≥50%; MET+, 2+/3+ ≥50%. bThe top 10 most frequent gene mutations, top 10 most frequent amplifications, and CLDN18-ARHGAP6/26 fusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between CLDN and other biomarkers (A) and PD-L1 CPS (B). All-negative: negative for neither MMR-D, EBV nor HER2. CLDN, claudin; CPS, combined positive score; EBV, Epstein–Barr virus; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; MMR-D, mismatch repair deficient; MMR-P, mismatch repair proficient. aPatients with available CPS results.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier plots of progression-free survival (PFS) with each line treatment according to CLDN expression. (A) first-line chemotherapy (platinum + fluoropyrimidine, n = 226), (B) second-line chemotherapy (taxanes ± RAM, n = 275), (C) anti-PD-1 antibody (n = 164). CI, confidence interval; CLDN, claudin; FP, fluoropyrimidine; HR, hazard ratio; RAM, ramucirumab; ref, reference.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier plots of overall survival (OS) in patients who received standard first-line chemotherapy (platinum + fluoropyrimidine, n = 226). HR, hazard ratio; ref, reference.

Comment in

References

    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–249. - PubMed
    1. Ajani J.A., D’Amico T.A., Bentrem D.J., et al. Gastric cancer, version 2.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20:167–192. - PubMed
    1. Cunningham D., Starling N., Rao S., et al. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:36–46. - PubMed
    1. Koizumi W., Narahara H., Hara T., et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:215–221. - PubMed
    1. Bang Y.J., van Cutsem E., Feyereislova A., et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:687–697. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms