Imaging the right atrium in pulmonary hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: Right atrial (RA) imaging has emerged as a promising tool for the evaluation of patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), albeit without systematic validation.

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane library were searched for studies investigating the prognostic value of RA imaging assessment in patients with PH from 2000 to June 2021 (PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42020212850). An inverse variance-weighted meta-analysis of univariable hazard ratios (HRs) was performed using a random effects model.

Results: Thirty-five studies were included (3,476 patients with PH; 74% female, 86% pulmonary arterial hypertension). Risk of bias was low/moderate (Quality of Prognosis Studies checklist). RA area (HR 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.08), RA indexed area (HR 1.09; 95% CI 1.04-1.14), RA peak longitudinal strain (PLS; HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.91-0.97) and RA total emptying fraction (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.94-0.98) were significantly associated with combined end-points including death, clinical worsening and/or lung transplantation; RA volume and volume index showed marginal significant associations. RA area (HR 1.06; 95% CI 1.04-1.07), RA indexed area (HR 1.12; 95% CI 1.07-1.17) and RA PLS (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-0.99) showed significant associations with mortality; RA total emptying fraction showed a marginal association.

Conclusions: Imaging-based RA assessment qualifies as a relevant prognostic marker in PH. RA area reliably predicts composite end-points and mortality, which underscores its clinical utility. RA PLS emerged as a promising imaging measure, but is currently limited by the number of studies and different acquisition methods.

Keywords: Imaging; meta-analysis; outcome; pulmonary hypertension; right atrium; systematic review.