Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 24;13(1):71.
doi: 10.3390/ani13010071.

The Effect of Early Neurological Stimulation on Puppy Welfare in Commercial Breeding Kennels

Affiliations

The Effect of Early Neurological Stimulation on Puppy Welfare in Commercial Breeding Kennels

Grace Boone et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Throughout their lives, dogs may experience various stressful events. Early neurological stimulation (ENS), which was shown to alter stress responses beneficially in some animals, has not been fully explored in dogs. Seventy-six small-breed puppies from one commercial breeding kennel were divided into three treatment groups: ENS, held, and control. Puppies in the ENS group received 30 s of handling exercises for 21 days after birth; puppies in the held group were simply held for the same amount of time. Puppies in the control group were managed as per normal breeder practices (i.e., routine husbandry and physical health checks). Physical health was assessed weekly, and puppies were generally healthy and clean. Behavioral responses to stranger approach and isolation tests were evaluated pre- and post-ground-transportation to a distributor. Puppies were more affiliative toward a stranger post-isolation than pre-isolation (p < 0.001), and post-transport than pre-transport (p < 0.001). At the distributor, puppies in the isolation test spent less time in exploratory locomotion (p < 0.001) and vocalized more than at the breeder’s kennel (p = 0.011). Treatment did not affect these results. Overall, the results suggest that the type of ENS used in this study may not provide the purported benefits to puppies’ stress responses in commercial breeding populations.

Keywords: ENS; breeding dogs; canine welfare; early gentling; ground transportation; puppy development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bio Sensor ENS exercises: (a) tactile stimulation—the puppy’s toes were tickled gently with a Q-tip; (b) head held erect—the puppy was held so the head is directly above the tail; (c) head pointed down—the puppy was held so the tail is above the head; (d) supine position—the puppy was held on its back; and (e) thermal stimulation—the puppy was placed on a cool, damp washcloth.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Held treatment—the puppy was held in a sternal position.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage of puppies in each treatment group (ENS, held, and control) showing each physical health problem measured across the first eight weeks of life prior to the application of stressors.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean weight for (A) female and (B) male puppies in each treatment group over the first eight weeks at the breeder’s kennel, prior to application of stressors. Error bars represent the standard errors of the means.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Summed scores for puppies tested with the PuppyFIDO tests pre- and post-isolation (isolation time) and transport to the distributor (transport time). Higher scores represent more affiliative behaviors in response to a stranger approaching.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Summed scores for puppies from the PuppyFIDO test showing differences between the three treatment groups (control, held, and ENS) for puppies with cropped ears (Yes) and uncropped puppies (No). Higher scores represent more affiliative behaviors in response to stranger’s approach.

References

    1. Taylor K., Mills D. The Effect of the Kennel Environment on Canine Welfare: A Critical Review of Experimental Studies. Anim. Welfare. 2007;16:435–447.
    1. Romaniuk A.C., Diana A., Barnard S., Weller J.E., Espinosa U.B., Dangoudoubiyam S., Shreyer T., Arnott G., Croney C. The Effect of Transportation on Puppy Welfare from Commercial Breeding Kennels to a Distributor. Animals. 2022;12:3379. doi: 10.3390/ani12233379. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moberg G.P. Biological Response to Stress: Implications for Animal Welfare. In: Moberg G.P., Mench J.A., editors. The Biology of Animal Stress: Basic Principles and Implications for Animal Welfare. CABI Publishing; Wallingford, UK: 2000. pp. 1–21.
    1. Dhabhar F.S., McEwen B.S. Acute Stress Enhances While Chronic Stress Suppresses Cell-Mediated Immunity in Vivo: A Potential Role for Leukocyte Trafficking. Brain Behav. Immun. 1997;11:286–306. doi: 10.1006/brbi.1997.0508. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lehman C.D., Rodin J., McEwen B.S., Brinton R. Impact of Environmental Stress on the Expression of Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus. Behav. Neurosci. 1991;105:241–245. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.105.2.241. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources