Pathologic Response of Associated Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 36612009
- PMCID: PMC9817531
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010013
Pathologic Response of Associated Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Contrary to traditional assumptions, recent evidence suggests that neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) given for invasive breast cancer may eradicate co-existent ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS), which may facilitate de-escalation of breast resections. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the eradication rate of DCIS by NST given for invasive breast cancer. Searches were performed in MEDLINE using appropriate search terms. Six studies (N = 659) in which pathological data were available regarding the presence of DCIS prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) were identified. Only one study investigating the impact of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) met the search criteria. After pooled analysis, post-NACT pathology showed no residual DCIS in 40.5% of patients (267/659; 95% CI: 36.8-44.3). There was no significant difference in DCIS eradication rate between triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HER2-positive disease (45% vs. 46% respectively). NET achieved eradication of DCIS in 15% of patients (9/59). Importantly, residual widespread micro-calcifications after NST did not necessarily indicate residual disease. In view of the results of the pooled analysis, the presence of extensive DCIS prior to NST should not mandate mastectomy and de-escalation to breast conserving surgery (BCS) should be considered in patients identified by contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI).
Keywords: breast cancer; down-staging; ductal carcinoma in-situ; neoadjuvant therapy.
Conflict of interest statement
K.M. has received honoraria for providing academic and clinical advice to Merit Medical. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
References
-
- Ploumen R.A.W., Keymeulen K., Kooreman L.F.S., van Kuijk S.M.J., Siesling S., Smidt M.L., van Nijnatten T.J.A. The percentage of residual DCIS in patients diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy: A nationwide retrospective study. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2022;48:60–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.10.016. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mazouni C., Peintinger F., Wan-Kau S., Andre F., Gonzalez-Angulo A.M., Symmans W.F., Meric-Bernstam F., Valero V., Hortobagyi G.N., Pusztai L. Residual ductal carcinoma in situ in patients with complete eradication of invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not adversely affect patient outcome. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007;25:2650–2655. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.2271. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
