Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 23;20(1):212.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010212.

Bentall Operation: Early Surgical Results, Seven-Year Outcomes, and Risk Factors Analysis

Affiliations

Bentall Operation: Early Surgical Results, Seven-Year Outcomes, and Risk Factors Analysis

Paolo Nardi et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Aim: To analyze early and mid-term outcomes of the Bentall operation. Methods: Two hundred and seventeen patients (mean age 65.6 ± 15.9 years, males/females 172/45) underwent Bentall operation in a 7-year period (January 2015−December 2021), on average, 30 Bentall operations occurred per year, using biological (n = 104) or mechanical (n = 113) valved conduits for the treatment of ascending aorta−aortic root aneurysms. Associate procedures were performed in 58 patients (26.7%); coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 35 (16%). Mean follow-up was 55.2 ± 24 (median 60.2) months. Cox model analysis was used to assess risk factors, Kaplan−Meier and log-rank tests were used to assess different survival rates. Results: Operative mortality was 1.38%. At 7 years, survival, freedom from cardiac death, and event-free survival were 93% ± 2%, 99% ± 1%, and 81% ± 5%. NYHA class (p < 0.0001), trans-aortic valve mean (p < 0.0001) and maximum (p < 0.000) gradients, left ventricular hypertrophy (p < 0.05), and pulmonary arterial pressure (p = 0.002) significantly improved vs. preoperative values. Concomitant CABG during Bentall operation independently affected late outcomes (HR 1.9−2.3; p-values < 0.05). Late survival was affected by concomitant CABG (84% ± 8% vs. 95% ± 2%, p = 0.04), preoperative myocardial infarction (91% ± 9% vs. 97% ± 2%, p = 0.02), and biological vs. mechanical prostheses valved conduits (91% ± 9% vs. 95% ± 3%, p = 0.02). Event-free survival also was affected by concomitant CABG (62% ± 14% vs. 85% ± 5%, p = 0.005) and biological prostheses (78% ± 8% vs. 84% ± 6%, p = 0.06). Freedom from endocarditis−redo operation was 83% ± 9% for biological prostheses vs. 89% ± 6% for mechanical prostheses (p = 0.49). Conclusions: Low rates of operative mortality and late complications make Bentall operation the gold standard for the treatment of ascending aorta−aortic root aneurysms. Coronary ischemic disease affects late outcomes. Biological prostheses should be preferred for the elderly.

Keywords: Bentall operation; aortic root surgery; ascending aorta replacement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All the authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Survival after Bentall operation (mean follow-up, 55 ± 24 (M 60.2) months).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Event-free survival after Bentall operation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Freedom from late cardiac death (a); from endocarditis and redo operation (b); from stroke (c).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Survival stratified by biological vs. mechanical prostheses (a); concomitant CABG (b); presence of previous MI (c) (log rank, Mantel–Cox test). CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting; MI: myocardial infarction.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Freedom from endocarditis–redo operation stratified by biological vs. mechanical prostheses valved conduits (Mantel–Cox test).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Adverse-event-free survival stratified by concomitant CABG (Mantel–Cox test). CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Event-free survival stratified by biological vs. mechanical prostheses valved conduits (Mantel–Cox test).

References

    1. Bentall H., De Bono A. A technique for complete replacement of the ascending aorta. Thorax. 1968;23:338–339. doi: 10.1136/thx.23.4.338. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wallen T., Habertheuer A., Bavaria J.E., Hughes G., Badhwar V., Jacobs J.P., Yerokun B., Thibault D., Milewski K., Desai N., et al. Elective Aortic Root Replacement in North America: Analysis of STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2019;107:1307–1312. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.12.039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stamou S.C., Williams M.L., Gunn T.M., Hagberg R.C., Lobdell K.W., Kouchoukos N.T. Aortic root surgery in the United States: A report from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2015;149:116–122.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.042. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nardi P., Pisano C., Ruvolo G. The Need for the STS Score Risk Stratification System for Aortic Root Aneurysms Surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2020;110:1780. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.03.083. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mookhoek A., Korteland N.M., Arabkhani B., Di Centa I., Lansac E., Bekkers J.A., Bogers A.J., Takkenberg J.J. Bentall Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2016;101:1684–1689. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.090. - DOI - PubMed