Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 29;20(1):614.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010614.

Assessing Differences in Attitudes toward Occupational Safety and Health Measures for Infection Control between Office and Assembly Line Employees during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Baseline Data from a Repeated Employee Survey

Affiliations

Assessing Differences in Attitudes toward Occupational Safety and Health Measures for Infection Control between Office and Assembly Line Employees during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Baseline Data from a Repeated Employee Survey

Jana Soeder et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

In our study, we investigated possible differences across occupational groups regarding employees’ perceived work-related risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2, attitudes toward technical, organisational, and personal occupational safety and health (OSH) measures for infection control, and factors associated with this attitude. We analysed baseline data (10 August to 25 October 2020) from a repeated standardised online survey distributed at a worldwide leading global supplier of technology and services in Germany. 2144 employees (32.4% women; age (mean ± SD): 44 ± 11 years) who worked predominantly remotely (n = 358), at an on-site office (n = 1451), and assembly line/manufacturing (n = 335) were included. The work-related SARS-CoV-2 risk of infection differed between office employees working remotely and on-site (mean ± SD = 2.9 ± 1.5 vs. 3.2 ± 1.5; Mann-Whitney-U-Test: W = 283,346; p < 0.002; ε2 = 0.01) and between on-site office and assembly line/manufacturing employees (3.8 ± 1.7; W = 289,174; p < 0.001; ε2 = 0.02). Attitude scores toward technical OSH-measures differed between remote and on-site office (4.3 ± 0.5 vs. 4.1 ± 0.6; W = 216,787; p < 0.001; ε2 = 0.01), and between on-site office and assembly line/manufacturing employees (3.6 ± 0.9; W = 149,881; p < 0.001; ε2 = 0.07). Findings were similar for organisational and personal measures. Affective risk perception, COVID-19-specific resilience, and information about COVID-19-related risks were associated with the employees’ attitudes. To promote positive attitudes, it seems to be important to consider occupational-group-specific context factors when implementing OSH-measures for infection control.

Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; baseline data; infection control measures; occupational SARS-CoV-2 risk of infection; occupational safety and health; workforce; working conditions; workplace health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. J.K., F.P., A.K. and K.A. have been involved as consultants and experts at Robert Bosch GmbH. The company had no role in the analysis of data, the interpretation of results, and the decision to publish the results. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Main subject areas of the standardised online employee survey at baseline.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Perceived probability of contracting COVID-19 in the workplace and in private surroundings, compared by occupational group: office predominantly remote (n = 357), office on-site (n = 1441), and assembly line/manufacturing (n = 335).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Boxplots showing the distribution of the assessed attitudes toward technical (A), organisational (B), and personal (C) OSH-measures for infection control, compared by occupational group: office remote, office on-site, and assembly line/manufacturing.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO) Statement on the Second Meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005): Emergency Committee Regarding the Outbreak of Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) 2020. [(accessed on 10 November 2021)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/30-01-2020-statement-on-the-second-meeting...
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) WHO Director-General’s opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19—11 March 2020: Covid-19 Outbreak. 2020. [(accessed on 10 November 2021)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-genera....
    1. Ritchie H., Mathie E., Rodés-Guirao L., Appel C., Gavrilov D., Giattino C., Hasell J., Macdonald B., Dattani S., Beltekian D., et al. Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) 2020. [(accessed on 3 December 2021)]. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/policy-responses-covid.
    1. Iftekhar E.N., Priesemann V., Balling R., Bauer S., Beutels P., Valdez A.C., Cuschieri S., Czypionka T., Dumpis U., Glaab E., et al. A look into the future of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe: An expert consultation. Lancet Reg. Health Eur. 2021;8:100185. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100185. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker M.G., Peckham T.K., Seixas N.S. Estimating the burden of United States workers exposed to infection or disease: A key factor in containing risk of COVID-19 infection. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0232452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232452. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types