Assessing Differences in Attitudes toward Occupational Safety and Health Measures for Infection Control between Office and Assembly Line Employees during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Baseline Data from a Repeated Employee Survey
- PMID: 36612934
- PMCID: PMC9819385
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010614
Assessing Differences in Attitudes toward Occupational Safety and Health Measures for Infection Control between Office and Assembly Line Employees during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Baseline Data from a Repeated Employee Survey
Abstract
In our study, we investigated possible differences across occupational groups regarding employees’ perceived work-related risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2, attitudes toward technical, organisational, and personal occupational safety and health (OSH) measures for infection control, and factors associated with this attitude. We analysed baseline data (10 August to 25 October 2020) from a repeated standardised online survey distributed at a worldwide leading global supplier of technology and services in Germany. 2144 employees (32.4% women; age (mean ± SD): 44 ± 11 years) who worked predominantly remotely (n = 358), at an on-site office (n = 1451), and assembly line/manufacturing (n = 335) were included. The work-related SARS-CoV-2 risk of infection differed between office employees working remotely and on-site (mean ± SD = 2.9 ± 1.5 vs. 3.2 ± 1.5; Mann-Whitney-U-Test: W = 283,346; p < 0.002; ε2 = 0.01) and between on-site office and assembly line/manufacturing employees (3.8 ± 1.7; W = 289,174; p < 0.001; ε2 = 0.02). Attitude scores toward technical OSH-measures differed between remote and on-site office (4.3 ± 0.5 vs. 4.1 ± 0.6; W = 216,787; p < 0.001; ε2 = 0.01), and between on-site office and assembly line/manufacturing employees (3.6 ± 0.9; W = 149,881; p < 0.001; ε2 = 0.07). Findings were similar for organisational and personal measures. Affective risk perception, COVID-19-specific resilience, and information about COVID-19-related risks were associated with the employees’ attitudes. To promote positive attitudes, it seems to be important to consider occupational-group-specific context factors when implementing OSH-measures for infection control.
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; baseline data; infection control measures; occupational SARS-CoV-2 risk of infection; occupational safety and health; workforce; working conditions; workplace health.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. J.K., F.P., A.K. and K.A. have been involved as consultants and experts at Robert Bosch GmbH. The company had no role in the analysis of data, the interpretation of results, and the decision to publish the results. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Exploring organizational aspects that promote health-related preventive behavior: using the example of work-related SARS-CoV-2 infection control measures in Germany, August 2020 to November 2021.Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 2;12:1388996. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1388996. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39416946 Free PMC article.
-
Adjusting working conditions and evaluating the risk of infection during the COVID-19 pandemic in different workplace settings in Germany: a study protocol for an explorative modular mixed methods approach.BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 18;10(11):e043908. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043908. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33208339 Free PMC article.
-
Association Between COVID-19 Exposure and Self-reported Compliance With Public Health Guidelines Among Essential Employees at an Institution of Higher Education in the US.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2116543. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16543. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34287634 Free PMC article.
-
The COVID-19 pandemic and the role of responsible leadership in health care: thinking beyond employee well-being and organisational sustainability.Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2021 Feb 8;34(1):52-68. doi: 10.1108/LHS-09-2020-0071. Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2021. PMID: 33818971 Review.
-
COVID-19 Prevention and Control Measures in Workplace Settings: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 24;18(15):7847. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157847. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34360142 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Exploring organizational aspects that promote health-related preventive behavior: using the example of work-related SARS-CoV-2 infection control measures in Germany, August 2020 to November 2021.Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 2;12:1388996. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1388996. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39416946 Free PMC article.
-
Pandemic preparedness in shaping psychosocial working conditions - insights for occupational safety and health from a longitudinal mixed-methods study during the COVID-19 pandemic at six company sites of one organization in Germany.PLoS One. 2025 Aug 11;20(8):e0328410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328410. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40788920 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing Attitudes and Participation Regarding a Pilot COVID-19 Workplace Vaccination Program in Southern Germany Considering the Occupational Health Perspective-A Mixed Methods Study.Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jun 9;11(6):1082. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11061082. Vaccines (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37376471 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization (WHO) Statement on the Second Meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005): Emergency Committee Regarding the Outbreak of Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) 2020. [(accessed on 10 November 2021)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/30-01-2020-statement-on-the-second-meeting...
-
- World Health Organization (WHO) WHO Director-General’s opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19—11 March 2020: Covid-19 Outbreak. 2020. [(accessed on 10 November 2021)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-genera....
-
- Ritchie H., Mathie E., Rodés-Guirao L., Appel C., Gavrilov D., Giattino C., Hasell J., Macdonald B., Dattani S., Beltekian D., et al. Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) 2020. [(accessed on 3 December 2021)]. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/policy-responses-covid.
-
- Iftekhar E.N., Priesemann V., Balling R., Bauer S., Beutels P., Valdez A.C., Cuschieri S., Czypionka T., Dumpis U., Glaab E., et al. A look into the future of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe: An expert consultation. Lancet Reg. Health Eur. 2021;8:100185. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100185. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous