Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 2;24(1):794.
doi: 10.3390/ijms24010794.

Chromosomal Rearrangements and Chromothripsis: The Alternative End Generation Model

Affiliations
Review

Chromosomal Rearrangements and Chromothripsis: The Alternative End Generation Model

Daniel de Groot et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Chromothripsis defines a genetic phenomenon where up to hundreds of clustered chromosomal rearrangements can arise in a single catastrophic event. The phenomenon is associated with cancer and congenital diseases. Most current models on the origin of chromothripsis suggest that prior to chromatin reshuffling numerous DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) have to exist, i.e., chromosomal shattering precedes rearrangements. However, the preference of a DNA end to rearrange in a proximal accessible region led us to propose chromothripsis as the reaction product of successive chromatin rearrangements. We previously coined this process Alternative End Generation (AEG), where a single DSB with a repair-blocking end initiates a domino effect of rearrangements. Accordingly, chromothripsis is the end product of this domino reaction taking place in a single catastrophic event.

Keywords: Alternative End Generation (AEG); Alternative End Joining (AEJ); DNA double-strand break repair; chromosomal rearrangements; chromothripsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relation between proximity to a single DSB and rearrangement frequency. Genes in proximity to the primary break site (Myc locus) are highly predisposed to becoming involved in a translocation reaction. Translocation events are gradient-colored (red to black), where intrachromosomal (red) are distinguished from interchromosomal (black) translocations. The number of genes with a defined number of rearrangements are grouped and plotted against the number of rearrangements. A small group of genes (e.g., Pim1, IL4ra, and Cd83) are interchromosomal but in fact reside proximal to the DSB. (Adapted from Hogenbirk, M. A. et al. PNAS 2016).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Modeling Chromothripsis: Shattering versus Consecutive Rearrangements. Schematic overview of consecutive AEG reactions leading to multiple different types of rearrangements and the comparison with a shattering-based model. In the shattering model, numerous DSBs are required to enable chromothripsis. In contrast, the AEG model proposes that a single DSB—here, between region e and f—generates a repair-blocking passive end (P) and an intact, i.e., active (A), DNA end. Because the P end blocks DSB repair, the A end is recombined preferentially with proximal accessible elements. This process, which can be associated with deletions, insertions, inversions, and double-minute formation, generates an alternative active end sustaining the domino effect. This catastrophic recombination process stops when the P end is resolved or deleted. While both chromosomal shattering and AEG result in the same chromothripsis product, this viewpoint likes to consider AEG as a model for chromothripsis.

References

    1. Metzker M.L. Sequencing technologies the next generation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010;11:31–46. doi: 10.1038/nrg2626. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stephens P.J., Greenman C.D., Fu B., Yang F., Bignell G.R., Mudie L.J., Pleasance E.D., Lau K.W., Beare D., Stebbings L.A., et al. Massive Genomic Rearrangement Acquired in a Single Catastrophic Event during Cancer Development. Cell. 2011;144:27–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.055. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holland A.J., Cleveland D.W. Chromoanagenesis and cancer: Mechanisms and consequences of localized, complex chromosomal rearrangements. Nat. Med. 2012;18:1630–1638. doi: 10.1038/nm.2988. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Korbel J.O., Campbell P.J. Criteria for inference of chromothripsis in cancer genomes. Cell. 2013;152:1226–1236. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pellestor F., Gaillard J., Schneider A., Puechberty J., Gatinois V. Chromoanagenesis, the mechanisms of a genomic chaos. Semin Cell Dev. Biol. 2022;123:90–99. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.01.004. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources