Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 20;12(1):12.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12010012.

Inhaled Sedation in Patients with COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An International Retrospective Study

Affiliations

Inhaled Sedation in Patients with COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An International Retrospective Study

Randy Coupet et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the shortage of intravenous sedatives has led to renewed interest in inhaled sedation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We hypothesized that inhaled sedation would be associated with improved clinical outcomes in COVID-19 ARDS patients.

Methods: Retrospective international study including mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 ARDS who required sedation and were admitted to 10 European and US intensive care units. The primary endpoint of ventilator-free days through day 28 was analyzed using zero-inflated negative binomial regression, before and after adjustment for site, clinically relevant covariates determined according to the univariate results, and propensity score matching.

Results: A total of 196 patients were enrolled, 78 of whom died within 28 days. The number of ventilator-free days through day 28 did not differ significantly between the patients who received inhaled sedation for at least 24 h (n = 111) and those who received intravenous sedation only (n = 85), with medians of 0 (interquartile range [IQR] 0-8) and 0 (IQR 0-17), respectively (odds ratio for having zero ventilator-free days through day 28, 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-2.92, p = 0.10). The incidence rate ratio for the number of ventilator-free days through day 28 if not 0 was 1.13 (95% CI, 0.84-1.52, p = 0.40). Similar results were found after multivariable adjustment and propensity matching.

Conclusion: The use of inhaled sedation in COVID-19 ARDS was not associated with the number of ventilator-free days through day 28.

Keywords: acute respiratory distress syndrome; coronavirus disease 2019; inhaled sedation; isoflurane; sevoflurane.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.S. has received unrestricted research grants from Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland and from Sedana Medical, Danderyd Sweden. M.S. has submitted a patent to mitigate the negative effects of surgery and/ or anesthesia for patients using medical gases, particularly oxygen and carbon dioxide. M.J. is a principal investigator of the SESAR trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04235608), a trial funded by the French Ministry of Health, the European Society of Anaesthesiology, and Sedana Medical. J.-M.C. and M.J. received fees from Sedana Medical for participation in scientific advisory panels; M.J. received fees from Sedana Medical for participation in scientific seminars; M.J. received consulting fees and fees for participation in a scientific advisory panel from Abbvie. There was no influence from these entities in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, and in writing. Other authors have no disclosure.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Primary outcome of ventilator-free days through day 28. (A) Median values (with interquartile ranges) in the patients who received inhaled sedation for at least 24 h (inhaled sedation group) and those who received intravenous sedation only (intravenous sedation group) through day 28. (B) Distribution of ventilator-free days through day 28 in both study groups.

References

    1. Murthy S., Gomersall C.D., Fowler R.A. Care for Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;323:1499–1500. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3633. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liao X., Wang B., Kang Y. Novel coronavirus infection during the 2019-2020 epidemic: Preparing intensive care units-the experience in Sichuan Province, China. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:357–360. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05954-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grasselli G., Pesenti A., Cecconi M. Critical Care Utilization for the COVID-19 Outbreak in Lombardy, Italy: Early Experience and Forecast During an Emergency Response. JAMA. 2020;323:1545–1546. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vincent J.L., Slutsky A.S. Coronavirus: Just imagine…. Crit. Care. 2020;24:90. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2824-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. FDA Drug Shortages Current and Resolved Drug Shortages and Discontinuations Reported to FDA. [(accessed on 20 August 2021)]; Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/drugshortages/default.cfm.

LinkOut - more resources