Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 20;12(1):25.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12010025.

Resistance to Somatostatin Analogs in Italian Acromegaly Patients: The MISS Study

Affiliations

Resistance to Somatostatin Analogs in Italian Acromegaly Patients: The MISS Study

Alessandro Maria Berton et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Approximately 60% of acromegaly patients are not adequately controlled by first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to identify the most relevant biomarkers specific for the Italian acromegaly population. Resistant patients were enrolled consecutively based on time of neurosurgery, while responders were collected in a 1:2 ratio. Clinical characteristics and T2-intensity on MRI scans at diagnosis were retrospectively re-evaluated. Histological analyses of CAM5.2 granulation patterns and SSTR2 expression were centrally performed. Sixty-three resistant patients and thirty-three responders were enrolled. A low-grade SSTR2 expression was the most relevant predictor of resistance identified (OR 4.58, p = 0.013), even considering CAM5.2 immunohistochemistry (OR 2.65, p = 0.047). T2-iso/hyperintense pattern on MRI was also associated with a 3.3-fold greater probability of poor response to medical treatment (p = 0.027), as well as a young age at diagnosis (OR 0.96, p = 0.035). In those patients treated only after neurosurgery due to persistent GH-hypersecretion (51, 53.1%) the absence of any appreciable adenomatous remnant on postoperative MRI was associated with a negligible risk of resistance (OR 0.04, p = 0.003). In the Italian acromegaly population, a low-grade SSTR2 expression seems to be the most relevant predictor of resistance to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands, followed by a SG/intermediate cytokeratin pattern and a T2-iso/hyperintense MRI signal.

Keywords: CAM5.2 granulation pattern; SSTR2; first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands; growth hormone-secreting adenoma; magnetic resonance imaging; precision medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported. The funder had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histological images showing two example cases (original magnification 200×). The first set (AC) shows a somatotroph adenoma (A: hematoxylin and eosin) with a densely granulated CAM5.2 pattern (B) and diffuse SSTR2 positivity (score 3) (C). Conversely, the second set (DF) shows a somatotroph adenoma (D: hematoxylin and eosin) sparsely granulated according to the extensive dot-like CAM5.2 pattern (E) and with focal, mainly cytoplasmic, SSTR2 positivity (score 1) (F).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Radiological images showing two example cases. Left a markedly hypointense somatotroph adenoma in T2-weighted MRI scans (A). By way of comparison, a hyperintense somatotroph adenoma in T2-weighted MRI scans (B) is shown on the right.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Median values of biochemical disease control parameters at enrolment in patients resistant (R-SRL) and in those responsive to somatostatin receptor ligands (S-SRL) (* p < 0.0001, ** p = 0.0002).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Median values of biochemical disease control parameters three months after surgery in patients resistant (R-SRL) and in those responsive to somatostatin receptor ligands (S-SRL) (* p < 0.01, ** p = 0.02).

References

    1. Ezzat S., Caspar-Bell G.M., Chik C.L., Denis M.-C., Domingue M., Imran S.A., Johnson M.D., Lochnan H.A., Nyomba B.L.G., Prebtani A., et al. Predictive Markers for Postsurgical Medical Management of Acromegaly: A Systematic Review and Consensus Treatment Guideline. Endocr. Pract. 2019;25:379–393. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0500. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Melmed S., Bronstein M.D., Chanson P., Klibanski A., Casanueva F.F., Wass J.A.H., Strasburger C.J., Luger A., Clemmons D.R., Giustina A. A Consensus Statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2018;14:552–561. doi: 10.1038/s41574-018-0058-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katznelson L., Laws E.R., Melmed S., Molitch M.E., Murad M.H., Utz A., Wass J.A.H. Acromegaly: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;99:3933–3951. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2700. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Giustina A., Barkhoudarian G., Beckers A., Ben-Shlomo A., Biermasz N., Biller B., Boguszewski C., Bolanowski M., Bollerslev J., Bonert V., et al. Multidisciplinary management of acromegaly: A consensus. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2020;21:667–678. doi: 10.1007/s11154-020-09588-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kasuki L., Wildemberg L.E., Gadelha M.R. MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Personalized medicine in the treatment of acromegaly. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2018;178:R89–R100. doi: 10.1530/EJE-17-1006. - DOI - PubMed