Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 20;12(1):31.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12010031.

Surgical and Oncological Outcomes of En-Bloc Resection for Malignancies Invading the Thoracic Spine

Affiliations

Surgical and Oncological Outcomes of En-Bloc Resection for Malignancies Invading the Thoracic Spine

Pierluigi Novellis et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Objective(s): There is still limited data in the literature concerning the survival of patients with tumors of the thoracic spine. In this study, we analyzed clinical features, perioperative and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent vertebrectomy for cancer. Furthermore, we evaluated the survival and surgical complications.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of thoracic spinal tumors treated by the same team between 1998 and 2018. We divided them into three groups according to type of tumor (primary vertebral, primary lung and metastases) and compared outcomes. For each patient, Overall Survival (OS) and Cumulative Incidence of Relapse (CIR) were estimated. Complications and survival were analyzed using a logistic model.

Results: Seventy-two patients underwent thoracic spine surgery (40 in group 1, 16 in each group 2 and 3). Thirty patients died at the end of the observation at a mean follow up time of 60 months (41%). The 5-year overall survival was 72% (95% CI: 0.52-0.84), 20% (95% CI: 0.05-0.43) and 27% (95% CI: 0.05-0.56) for each group, respectively. CIR of group 3 was higher (HR 2.57, 95% CI: 1.22-5.45, p = 0.013). The logistic model revealed that age was related to complications (p = 0.04), while surgery for a type 3 tumor was related to mortality (p = 0.02).

Conclusions: Although the cohort size was limited, primary vertebral tumors displayed the best 5-y-OS with an acceptable complications rate. The indication of surgery should be advised by a multidisciplinary team and only for selected cases. Finally, the use of a combined approach does not increase the risk of complications.

Keywords: lung cancer invading spine; spine tumor; vertebral T4 NSCLC; vertebral metastases; vertebral tumor resection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Giulia Veronesi has received honoraria from AbMedica SpA, Medtronic and Johnson & Johnson. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest. This study did not receive funds. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Operative field during vertebral resection and posterior spinal fixing. T (a) posterior release of the spinal cord at C7-D3 level; (b) Release of the spinal cord at D4-D9 levels; (c) left thoraco abdominal incision for spinal involvement at D11-L2 levels to prevent liver injuries.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The 5-year overall survival for group 1 (primary vertebral tumors), group 2 (primary tumors of lung infiltrating spine) and group 3 (vertebral metastases) was 72% (95% CI: 0.52–0.84), 20% (95% CI: 0.05–0.43) and 27% (95% CI: 0.05–0.56), respectively. Numbers below the time axis are patients at risk and Kaplan–Maier estimates (95% CI).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) among the different tumor groups resulted 52% (95% CI: 0.33–0.67) for primary vertebral tumors (group 1), 41% (95% CI: 0.17–0.63) for primary tumors of lung infiltrating spine (group 2) and 72% for vertebral metastases (group 3) (95% CI: 0.34–0.91). Numbers below the time axis are patients at risk and cumulative incidence estimates (95% CI).

References

    1. Pettiford B.L., Schuchert M.J., Jeyabalan G., Landreneau J.R., Kilic A., Landreneau J.P., Awais O., Kent M.S., Ferson P.F., Luketich J.D., et al. Technical challenges and utility of anterior exposure for thoracic spine pathology. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008;86:1762–1768. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.087. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Giacomo T., Francioni F., Diso D., Tarantino R., Anile M., Venuta F., Coloni G.F. Anterior approach to the thoracic spine. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2011;12:692–695. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.257360. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Goethem J.W.M., van den Hauwe L., Ozsarlak O., De Schepper A.M.A., Parizel P.M. Spinal tumors. Eur. J. Radiol. 2004;50:159–176. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.10.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paulson D.L. Carcinomas in the superior pulmonary sulcus. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1975;70:1095–1104. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(19)39657-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chambers A., Routledge T., Billè A., Scarci M. Does surgery have a role in T4N0 and T4N1 lung cancer? Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2010;11:473–479. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.235119. - DOI - PubMed