Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 28;12(1):243.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12010243.

Clinical Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanics following Laser Refractive Surgery in Myopic Eyes: A Review of the Literature

Affiliations
Review

Clinical Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanics following Laser Refractive Surgery in Myopic Eyes: A Review of the Literature

Zofia Pniakowska et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

The role of corneal biomechanics in laser vision correction (LVC) is currently being raised in the assessment of postoperative corneal ectasia risk. The aim of the paper was to evaluate the changes in corneal biomechanics after LVC procedures based on a systematic review of current studies. The results of a search of the literature in the PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases were selected for final consideration according to the PRISMA 2020 flow diagram. Included in our review were 17 prospective clinical studies, with at least 6 months of follow-up time. Corneal biomechanical properties were assessed by Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA), or Corvis ST. The results of the study revealed the highest corneal biomechanics reduction after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) followed by small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and surface procedures, such as photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted sub-epithelial keratectomy (LASEK). In SMILE procedure treatment planning, the use of thicker caps preserves the corneal biomechanics. Similarly, reduction of flap thickness in LASIK surgery maintains the corneal biomechanical strength. Future prospective clinical trials with standardization of the study groups and surgical parameters are needed to confirm the results of the current review.

Keywords: Corvis ST; LASEK; LASIK; PRK; SMILE; corneal biomechanics; corneal hysteresis; corneal resistance factor; laser vision correction; ocular response analyzer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prisma 2020 flow diagram for Identification of studies via databases.

References

    1. Wolle M.A., Randleman J.B., Woodward M.A. Complications of refractive surgery: Ectasia after refractive surgery. Int. Ophthalmol. Clin. 2016;56:127–139. doi: 10.1097/IIO.0000000000000102. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sutton G., Lawless M., Hodge C. Laser in situ keratomileusis in 2012: A review. Clin. Exp. Optom. 2014;97:18–29. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12075. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guo H., Hosseini-Moghaddam S.M., Hodge W. Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE versus FLEX, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19:167. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1165-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Damgaard I.B., Reffat M., Hjortdal J. Review of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Following LASIK and SMILE for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism. Open Ophthalmol. J. 2018;12:164–174. doi: 10.2174/1874364101812010164. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wong Y.Z., Lam K.C. Influence of corneal astigmatism, corneal curvature and meridional differences on corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor. Clin. Exp. Opt. 2011;94:418–424. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00591.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources