Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1987 Nov;126(5):783-95.
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114715.

Effects of passive smoking in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effects of passive smoking in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial

K H Svendsen et al. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Nov.

Abstract

The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT), conducted in 1973-1982, provided a unique opportunity to study the effect of passive smoking on men whose wives smoke. MRFIT participants who reported at entry that they had never smoked tobacco products were classified according to the smoking status of their wives. Men with wives who smoked had similar mean levels of serum thiocyanate (54.3 vs. 53.9 mumol/liter, p = 0.83) but higher mean levels of expired carbon monoxide (7.7 vs. 7.1 ppm, p = 0.001). Lower levels of pulmonary function (by maximum forced expiratory volume in one second) were also observed in these men (3,493.1 vs. 3,591.9 ml, p = 0.04). The relative risks, for men whose wives smoked compared with men whose wives did not smoke, for the endpoints coronary heart disease death, fatal or nonfatal coronary heart disease event, and death from any cause were 2.11 (p = 0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-6.46), 1.48 (p = 0.13, 95% CI 0.89-2.47), and 1.96 (p = 0.08, 95% CI 0.93-4.11), respectively. When smokers who quit prior to entry were included in the analyses, the relative risks, for men whose wives smoked compared with men whose wives did not smoke, for the above endpoints were 1.45 (p = 0.25, 95% CI 0.77-2.73), 1.19 (p = 0.29, 95% CI 0.85-1.65), and 1.72 (p = 0.01, 95% CI 1.12-2.64), respectively. These relative risk estimates did not change appreciably after adjusting for other baseline risk factors. The results suggest that passive exposure to cigarette smoke may have a deleterious impact on the health of nonsmokers and that nonsmokers may be at an increased risk of death through passive exposure to cigarette smoke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types