Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 23;23(1):147.
doi: 10.3390/s23010147.

SDFnT-Based Parameter Estimation for OFDM Radar Systems with Intercarrier Interference

Affiliations

SDFnT-Based Parameter Estimation for OFDM Radar Systems with Intercarrier Interference

Jingqi Wang et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

The orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) radar suffers from severe performance degradation in range-velocity estimation in high mobility scenarios. In this paper, a novel intercarrier interference (ICI)-free parameter estimation method for OFDM radar is proposed. By employing a scale discrete Fresnel transform (SDFnT), the OFDM radar signals are converted to the scale Fresnel domain, and the orthogonality of subcarriers can be recovered with the optimal scale factor. Furthermore, due to the compatibility of the SDFnT and the discrete Fourier Transform (DFT), the proposed method has low computational complexity and high feasibility for OFDM radar implementation. Simulation results show that the proposed SDFnT-based scheme effectively eliminates the ICI effect for single and multiple targets and achieves high accuracy delay-Doppler estimation for OFDM radar systems in circumstances of high velocity and low SNR with consistency and robustness.

Keywords: intercarrier interference (ICI); orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM); radar; scale discrete Fresnel transform (SDFnT).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the proposed scheme.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimation accuracy comparison in terms of SNR (a) RMSE for the range estimation (b) RMSE for the velocity estimation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Estimation accuracy comparison in terms of velocity (a) RMSE for the range estimation (b) RMSE for the velocity estimation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Normalized range-velocity image of a one-point target with R = 400 m and V = 260 m/s, level in dB. (a) SDFnT-based method. (b) 2D-FFT method.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Single-target results in terms of SNR (a) RMSE for the range estimation (b) RMSE for the velocity estimation.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Single-target results in terms of velocity (a) RMSE for the range estimation (b) RMSE for the velocity estimation.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Normalized range-velocity image of three clustered targets with R = [400 m, 400 m, and 394 m] and V = [260 m/s, 253 m/s, and 260 m/s], level in dB (a) Using the SDFnT-based method (b) Using the 2D-FFT method.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Clustered multi-target results in terms of SNR (a) RMSE for the range estimation (b) RMSE for the velocity estimation.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Scattered multi-target results in terms of SNR (a) RMSE for the range estimation (b) RMSE for the velocity estimation.

References

    1. Bică M., Koivunen V. Generalized Multicarrier Radar: Models and Performance. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2016;64:4389–4402. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2016.2566610. - DOI
    1. Giroto de Oliveira L., Nuss B., Alabd M.B., Diewald A., Pauli M., Zwick T. Joint Radar-Communication Systems: Modulation Schemes and System Design. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2022;70:1521–1551. doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2021.3126887. - DOI
    1. Saleem A., Cui H., He Y., Boag A. Channel Propagation Characteristics for Massive Multiple-Input/Multiple-Output Systems in a Tunnel Environment [Measurements Corner] IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2022;64:126–142. doi: 10.1109/MAP.2022.3162807. - DOI
    1. Zhou W., Zhang R., Chen G., Wu W. Integrated Sensing and Communication Waveform Design: A Survey. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 2022;3:1930–1949. doi: 10.1109/OJCOMS.2022.3215683. - DOI
    1. Berger C.R., Demissie B., Heckenbach J., Willett P., Zhou S. Signal Processing for Passive Radar Using OFDM Waveforms. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 2010;4:226–238. doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2009.2038977. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources