Aortic arch surgery for type B aortic dissection: How far should we go? The value of a hybrid approach
- PMID: 36619481
- PMCID: PMC9810843
- DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.6742
Aortic arch surgery for type B aortic dissection: How far should we go? The value of a hybrid approach
Abstract
Traditionally, the management of type B aortic dissection has been the domain of the vascular surgeons. Timing and type of intervention still generate debate. We sought to review our early experience with the treatment of this condition based on a hybrid approach following an aortic multi-disciplinary team meeting involving close cooperation between cardiac surgeons, vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, vascular anesthetists, and cardiac anesthetists. Four patients (age 41-56 years; 3 males; 1 female) with type B aortic dissection underwent aortic arch surgery through a hybrid approach: one elective procedure consisting of ascending aorta and hemi-arch replacement with debranching followed by thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR); one redo procedure requiring aortic arch replacement with hybrid frozen elephant trunk; two acute presentations (aortic arch replacement and debranching followed by TEVAR; AVR with ascending aorta, arch, and proximal descending thoracic aorta replacement with conventional elephant trunk and debranching). Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest was required in three patients. Despite respiratory complications and slightly prolonged postoperative course, all patients survived without onset of stroke, paraplegia, malperfusion, endoleak, or need for re-exploration. Follow-up remains satisfactory. Different factors may affect outcome following complex aortic procedures. Nevertheless, close cooperation between cardiac surgeons, vascular surgeons, and interventional radiologists may reduce potential for complications and address aspects that may not be completely within the domain of individual specialists.
Keywords: PETTYCOAT and STABILIZE technique; TEVAR; aortic arch; aortic team; hybrid approach; surgery; type B aortic dissection.
© 2023 The Authors. Clinical Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures







References
-
- Czerny M, Schmidli J, Adler S, et al. Editor's choice – current options and recommendations for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch: an expert consensus Document of the European Association for Cardio‐Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) & the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57:165‐198. - PubMed
-
- Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, et al. The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014;35(41):2873‐2926. - PubMed
-
- Riambau V, Böckler D, Brunkwall J, et al. Editor's choice e management of descending thoracic aorta diseases. clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53:4‐52. - PubMed
-
- Nienaber CA, Fattori R, Lund G, et al. Nonsurgical reconstruction of thoracic aortic dissection by stent graft placement. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1539‐1545. - PubMed
-
- Dake MD, Kato N, Mitchell RS, Semba CP, Razavi MK, Shimono T. Endovascular stent graft placement for the treatment of acute aortic dissection. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1546‐1552. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources