The combination of chest compression synchronized ventilation and aortic balloon occlusion improve the outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in swine
- PMID: 36619612
- PMCID: PMC9810756
- DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1057000
The combination of chest compression synchronized ventilation and aortic balloon occlusion improve the outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in swine
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum: The combination of chest compression synchronized ventilation and aortic balloon occlusion improve the outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in swine.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 4;10:1177034. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1177034. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37081844 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Aim: The primary mission of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is to provide adequate blood flow and oxygen delivery for restoring spontaneous circulation from cardiac arrest (CA) events. Previously, studies demonstrated that chest compression synchronized ventilation (CCSV) improved systemic oxygen supply during CPR, and aortic balloon occlusion (ABO) augments the efficacy of external CPR by increasing blood perfusion to vital organs. However, both them failed to make a significant improvement in return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). In this study, we investigated the effects of combined CCSV and ABO on the outcomes of CPR in swine.
Methods: Thirty-one male domestic swine were subjected to 8 min of electrically induced and untreated CA followed by 8 min of CPR. CPR was performed by continuous chest compressions and mechanical ventilation. At the beginning of CPR, the animals were randomized to receive intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV, n = 10), CCSV (n = 7), IPPV + ABO (n = 7), or CCSV + ABO (n = 7). During CPR, gas exchange and systemic hemodynamics were measured, and ROSC was recorded. After resuscitation, the function and injury biomarkers of vital organs including heart, brain, kidney, and intestine were evaluated.
Results: During CPR, PaO2 was significantly higher accompanied by significantly greater regional cerebral oxygen saturation in the CCSV and CCSV + ABO groups than the IPPV group. Coronary perfusion pressure, end-tidal carbon dioxide, and carotid blood flow were significantly increased in the IPPV + ABO and CCSV + ABO groups compared with the IPPV group. ROSC was achieved in five of ten (IPPV), five of seven (CCSV), six of seven (IPPV + ABO), and seven of seven (CCSV + ABO) swine, with the rate of resuscitation success being significantly higher in the CCSV + ABO group than the IPPV group (P = 0.044). After resuscitation, significantly improved myocardial and neurological function, and markedly less cardiac, cerebral, renal, and intestinal injuries were observed in the CCSV + ABO group compared with the IPPV group.
Conclusion: The combination of CCSV and ABO improved both ventilatory and hemodynamic efficacy during CPR, promoted ROSC, and alleviated post-resuscitation multiple organ injury in swine.
Keywords: aortic balloon occlusion; cardiac arrest; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; chest compression synchronized ventilation; hemodynamics; organ protection; oxygenation.
Copyright © 2022 Xu, Khan, Zhang, Wang, Zhou, Zheng, Chen, Zhou and Zhang.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of Chest Compression-Synchronized Ventilation in Patients with Cardiac Arrest.J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 31;14(7):2394. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072394. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40217844 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of different ventilation strategies during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective study from the German Resuscitation Registry.Resuscitation. 2025 Aug 7:110764. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110764. Online ahead of print. Resuscitation. 2025. PMID: 40783094
-
Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model.PLoS One. 2015 May 26;10(5):e0127759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127759. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26011525 Free PMC article.
-
[New mechanical methods for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Literature study and analysis of effectiveness].Anaesthesist. 1997 Mar;46(3):220-30. doi: 10.1007/s001010050395. Anaesthesist. 1997. PMID: 9163267 Review. German.
-
[Ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). A literature study and analysis of ventilation strategies].Anaesthesist. 1997 Feb;46(2):133-41. doi: 10.1007/s001010050383. Anaesthesist. 1997. PMID: 9133175 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Chest compression synchronized ventilation during prolonged experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves oxygenation but may cause pneumothoraces.Resusc Plus. 2025 Feb 28;22:100918. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100918. eCollection 2025 Mar. Resusc Plus. 2025. PMID: 40161292 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Panchal A, Bartos J, Cabañas J, Donnino M, Drennan I, Hirsch K, et al. Part 3: adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. (2020) 142:S366–468. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916 - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources