Inguinal hernia treatment in Switzerland: inpatient vs. outpatient setting - HerStAmb Study (prospective observational two-centre comparative study)
- PMID: 36622458
- DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02766-y
Inguinal hernia treatment in Switzerland: inpatient vs. outpatient setting - HerStAmb Study (prospective observational two-centre comparative study)
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Journal.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Feb 16;408(1):92. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02824-5. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023. PMID: 36792843 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Purpose: Since 01/2018, AVOS (ambulant vor stationär = outpatient to inpatient) regulation has been progressively implemented in hernia surgery in Switzerland. The aim of this prospective, observational, two-centre comparative study was to compare the outcome of outpatient and inpatient post-operative care in terms of AVOS by examining the re-admission rate, complication rate and quality of life in patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair.
Methods: The study ran between 01/2019 and 04/2020 and included 237 patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Treatment setting was decided according to AVOS guidelines. Primary endpoint was re-admission rate within 6 weeks postoperatively. Secondary endpoints were the complication rate and patient outcome (quality of life) at 6 weeks follow-up postoperatively, as measured by the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36).
Results: Complications occurred in 11 (14%) inpatient patients, but none required re-admitting for revision until follow-up at 6 weeks after discharge. In the outpatient group, there were 27 (17%) complications reported, while 6 (4%) of these patients crossed over to the inpatient group immediately after surgery. None of the other complications required re-admission until follow-up at 6 weeks. No significant relationship between treatment setting and number of complications/re-admission rate (p=0.458, p=0.061) was observed. The mean outcome (SF-36) between the treatment groups was not significantly different (p=0.16-0.856).
Conclusion: In terms of AVOS selection criteria in Switzerland, primary unilateral inguinal hernia can be safely treated in both treatment settings. Re-admission rates, complications and quality of life do not significantly differ. Day surgery in terms of AVOS might be as effective and efficient, both from the patient's perspective and that of the institution.
Trial registration number: NCT05234242.
Keywords: AVOS; Complications; Inguinal hernia treatment; Inpatient; Outcome; Outpatient; Re-admission.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22:1–165
-
- Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K (2003) Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet 362:1561–1571 - PubMed
-
- Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:188–189 - PubMed
-
- Tschuor C, Metzger J, Clavien PA, Vonlanthen R, Lehmann K (2015) Inguinal hernia repair in Switzerland. Hernia 19(5):741–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1385-2 - PubMed
-
- Light D, Stephenson BM, Sanders DL, British Hernia Society (2020) Management of the uncomplicated primary inguinal hernia in 2019: the practice amongst members of the British Hernia Society. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 102(3):191–193. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2019.0152 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
