Variation across analysts in statistical significance, yet consistently small effect sizes
- PMID: 36623183
- PMCID: PMC9933094
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2218957120
Variation across analysts in statistical significance, yet consistently small effect sizes
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare competing interests. The authors have organizational affiliations to disclose, M.B.M. is Associate Director of the Stanford University Center for Open and Reproducible Science and is a member of the research advisory boards of Sentience Institute and Greener By Default. T.J.V. has received personal fees from Flerish and from Flourishing Metrics.
Comment on
-
Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov;119(44):e2203150119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2203150119. Epub 2022 Oct 28. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022. PMID: 36306328 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cummings P., Arguments for and against standardized mean differences (effect sizes). Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 165, 592–596 (2011). - PubMed
-
- Cohen J., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Routledge, 2013).
-
- Wang C., Lee W.-C., A simple method to estimate prediction intervals and predictive distributions: Summarizing meta-analyses beyond means and confidence intervals. Res. Synth. Methods 10, 255–266 (2019). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources