Short-term effectiveness of dapagliflozin versus DPP-4 inhibitors in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicentre retrospective study
- PMID: 36624223
- PMCID: PMC10261249
- DOI: 10.1007/s40618-022-02002-2
Short-term effectiveness of dapagliflozin versus DPP-4 inhibitors in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicentre retrospective study
Abstract
Aim: To compare effectiveness of dapagliflozin versus DPP-4 inhibitors on individualized HbA1c targets and extra-glycaemic endpoints among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Methods: This was a multicentre retrospective study on patients aged 70-80 years with HbA1c above individualized target and starting dapagliflozin or DPP-4 inhibitors in 2015-2017. The primary outcome was the proportion reaching individualized HbA1c targets. Confounding by indication was addressed by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), multivariable adjustment (MVA), or propensity score matching (PSM).
Results: Patients initiating dapagliflozin (n = 445) differed from those initiating DPP-4i (n = 977) and balance between groups was achieved with IPTW or PSM. The median follow-up was 7.5 months and baseline HbA1c was 8.3%. A smaller proportion of patients initiating dapagliflozin attained individualized HbA1c target as compared to those initiating DPP-4 inhibitors (RR 0.73, p < 0.0001). IPTW, MVA, and PSM yielded similar results. Between-group difference in the primary outcome was observed among patients with lower eGFR or longer disease duration. Dapagliflozin allowed greater reductions in body weight and blood pressure than DPP-4 inhibitors.
Conclusions: Elderly patients with T2D initiating dapagliflozin had a lower probability of achieving individualized HbA1c targets than those initiating DPP-4 inhibitors but displayed better improvements in extra-glycaemic endpoints.
Keywords: Aging; Cardiovascular; Heart failure; Kidney disease; Observational.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
MLM received lecture fees or advisory board fees from Eli Lilly, MSD, Novo Nordisk, SLAPharma, and Servier. IR Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Consultant: AstraZeneca, Curolife, BOL Pharma Speaker’s Bureau: AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk. AC has consulting relationships with Astra Zeneca and Novo Nordisk; has participated in advisory panels for Abbot, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Novo-Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda; has received speaker fees from Abbot, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bruno Farmaceutici, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Novo-Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda; has received research supporting grants from Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk. MR received lecture and advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Mundipharma, and Novo Nordisk. AL received grant support, lecture or advisory board fees from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Abbott, and Eli Lilly. FB was a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim–Eli Lilly and Company and received lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim–Eli Lilly and Company and AstraZeneca. EB received honoraria from Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi; travel support from Eli Lilly and Company and Servier Laboratories; and has participated on advisory boards for Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Becton Dickinson, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sanyo, Eli Lilly and Company, MSD, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi. AA received research grants, lecture, or advisory board fees from Merck Sharp & Dome, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boeringher-Ingelheim, Sanofi, Mediolanum, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, Lilly, Servier, and Takeda. GPF received lecture or consultancy fees or grant support from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer, Lilly, Merck-Sharp-Dome, Mundipharma, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Servier.
Figures


References
-
- Bonora E, Cataudella S, Marchesini G, Miccoli R, Vaccaro O, Fadini GP, Martini N, Rossi E. A view on the quality of diabetes care in Italy and the role of Diabetes Clinics from the 2018 ARNO Diabetes Observatory. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2020;30:1945–1953. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2020.08.018. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ghosh-Swaby OR, Goodman SG, Leiter LA, Cheng A, Connelly KA, Fitchett D, Juni P, Farkouh ME, Udell JA. Glucose-lowering drugs or strategies, atherosclerotic cardiovascular events, and heart failure in people with or at risk of type 2 diabetes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8:418–435. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30038-3. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Neuen BL, Young T, Heerspink HJL, Neal B, Perkovic V, Billot L, Mahaffey KW, Charytan DM, Wheeler DC, Arnott C, Bompoint S, Levin A, Jardine MJ. SGLT2 inhibitors for the prevention of kidney failure in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7:845–854. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30256-6. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous