Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan;56(1):330-341.
doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-02054-5. Epub 2023 Jan 9.

The face inversion effect does not provide a pure measure of holistic face processing

Christian Gerlach  1 , Erik Mogensen  2
Affiliations

The face inversion effect does not provide a pure measure of holistic face processing

Christian Gerlach et al. Behav Res Methods. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

It is widely held that upright faces are processed more holistically than inverted faces and that this difference is reflected in the face inversion effect. It is not clear, however, how the inversion effect can best be measured, whether it is task specific, or even whether it specifically correlates with processing of upright faces. We examined these questions in a large sample (N = 420) who provided data on processing of upright and inverted stimuli in two different tasks with faces and one with objects. We find that the inversion effects are task dependent, and that they do not correlate better among face processing tasks than they do across face and object processing tasks. These findings were obtained regardless of whether inversion effects were measured by means of difference scores or regression. In comparison, only inversion effects based on regression predicted performance with upright faces in tasks other than those the inversion effects were derived from. Critically, however, inversion effects based on regression also predicted performance with inverted faces to a similar degree as they predicted performance with upright faces. Consequently, and contrary to what is commonly assumed, inversion effects do not seem to capture effects specific to holistic processing of upright faces. While the present findings do not bring us closer to an understanding of which changes in cognitive processing are induced by inversion, they do suggest that inversion effects do not reflect a unitary construct; an implicit assumption that seems to characterize much of the research regarding face processing.

Keywords: Difference scores; Face inversion effect; Face processing; Holistic processing; Individual differences; Regression.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bate, S., Bennetts, R. J., Gregory, N., Tree, J. J., Murray, E., Adams, A., Bobak, A. K., Penton, T., Yang, T., & Banissy, M. J. (2019). Objective patterns of face recognition deficits in 165 adults with self-reported developmental prosopagnosia. Brain Sciences, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9060133
    1. Bennetts, R. J., Mole, J., & Bate, S. (2017). Super-recognition in development: A case study of an adolescent with extraordinary face recognition skills. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 34(6), 357–376. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bobak, A. K., Hancock, P. J. B., & Bate, S. (2016). Super-recognisers in action: Evidence from face-matching and face memory tasks. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(1), 81–91. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boutet, I., Nelson, E. A., Watier, N., Cousineau, D., Béland, S., & Collin, C. A. (2021). Different measures of holistic face processing tap into distinct but partially overlapping mechanisms. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83(7), 2905–2923. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02337-7 - DOI
    1. Bowles, D. C., McKone, E., Dawel, A., Duchaine, B., Palermo, R., Schmalzl, L., Rivolta, D., Wilson, C. E., & Yovel, G. (2009). Diagnosing prosopagnosia: Effects of ageing, sex, and participant-stimulus ethnic match on the Cambridge face memory test and Cambridge face perception test. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26(5), 423–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290903343149 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types