Evaluation of heterogeneity in meta-analysis
- PMID: 36626069
- DOI: 10.1111/codi.16473
Evaluation of heterogeneity in meta-analysis
Comment on
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic resections for diverticular disease.Colorectal Dis. 2022 Oct;24(10):1105-1116. doi: 10.1111/codi.16227. Epub 2022 Aug 9. Colorectal Dis. 2022. PMID: 35723895
References
REFERENCES
-
- Larkins K, Mohan H, Apte SS, Chen V, Rajkomar A, Larach JT, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic resections for diverticular disease. Colorectal Dis. 2022;24(10):1105-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16227
-
- Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR, editors. Choosing an effect size index. In: Introduction to meta-analysis. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley; 2021. p. 38.
-
- Borenstein M. Research note: in a meta-analysis, the I2 index does not tell us how much the effect size varies across studies. J Physiother. 2020;66(2):135-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2020.02.011
-
- IntHout J, Ioannidis JPA, Rovers MM, Goeman JJ. Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(7):e010247. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010247
-
- Dziri C, Slim K. What the surgeons need to know about meta-analyses in 2023, beyond the simple odds ratio. J Visc Surg. 2022;159(6):480-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2022.10.003
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
