Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 1;58(2):136-142.
doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001826.

Nutritional Assessment in Patients after Gastric Electrical Stimulation (GES)

Affiliations

Nutritional Assessment in Patients after Gastric Electrical Stimulation (GES)

Tanureet Kochar et al. J Clin Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Background: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is used for patients with drug-refractory gastroparesis (Gp) symptoms. Approximately two-thirds of patients with Gp symptoms are either overweight or obese. We aimed to assess symptoms and nutritional status pre-GES and post-GES placement in a large sample of drug-refractory Gp patients.

Methods: We conducted a chart review of 282 patients with drug-refractory Gp who received temporary followed by permanent GES at an academic medical center. Gastrointestinal symptoms were collected by a traditional standardized PRO (0-4, 0 being asymptomatic and 4 being worst symptoms), baseline nutritional status by BMI plus subjective global assessment (SGA score A, B, C, for mild, moderate, and severe nutritional deficits), ability to tolerate diet, enteral tube access, and parenteral therapy were assessed at baseline and after permanent GES placement.

Results: Comparing baseline with permanent, GES was found to significantly improve upper GI symptoms in all quartiles. Of the 282 patients with baseline body mass index (BMI) information, 112 (40%) patients were severely malnourished at baseline, of which 36 (32%) patients' nutritional status improved after GES. Among all patients, 76 (68%) patients' nutritional status remained unchanged. Many patients with high BMI were malnourished by SGA.

Conclusion: We conclude that symptomatic patients of different BMIs showed improvement in their GI symptoms irrespective of baseline nutritional status. Severely malnourished patients were found to have an improvement in their nutritional status after GES therapy. We conclude that BMI, even if high, is not by itself a contraindication for GES therapy for symptomatic patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03876288.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Jung HK, Choung RS, Locke GRIII, et al. The incidence, prevalence, and outcomes of patients with gastroparesis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, from 1996 to 2006. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:1225–1233.
    1. Camilleri M, Parkman HP, Shafi MA, et al. Clinical guideline: management of gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:18–37.
    1. Heckert J, Parkman HP. Therapeutic response to domperidone in gastroparesis: A prospective study using the GCSI-daily diary. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30:e13046.
    1. Williams PA, Nikitina Y, Kedar A, et al. Long-term effects of gastric stimulation on gastric electrical physiology. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:50–55; discussion p.5-6.
    1. Limketkai BN, LeBrett W, Lin L, et al. Nutritional approaches for gastroparesis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5:1017–1026.

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources