Evaluation of Self-Reported professionalism lapses among dental undergraduate students: A cross-sectional study from a Malaysian dental faculty
- PMID: 36626271
- DOI: 10.1111/eje.12893
Evaluation of Self-Reported professionalism lapses among dental undergraduate students: A cross-sectional study from a Malaysian dental faculty
Abstract
Introduction: Professionalism and academic integrity are important components of dental education as they influence not just the present-day learning process, but also the practice of dentistry in future. This study evaluated self-reported professional lapses, academic dishonesty behaviours among peers and recommended sanctions for such lapses.
Materials and methods: Dundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory I: Academic Integrity questionnaire was administered to BDS students of a private dental institution in Malaysia. Differences in the level of recommended sanctions were assessed by Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis test.
Results: There was unanimous agreement that all 34 statements of lapses of academic integrity as unacceptable. The highest agreement (95.6%) was related to threatening or abusing university employees or students and involvement in paedophilic activities, whereas the lowest agreement was observed for getting or giving help for coursework against rules (47.3%). The most frequent behaviours observed among peers were lack of class punctuality (55.1%) and providing and receiving proxy attendance services (49.3%). About 36% admitted to not being punctual themselves, 26.8% for accepting or providing help for course work and 22.9% for receiving and providing proxy attendance. Female students displayed stricter recommended sanctions, with the most significant difference relating to joking disrespectfully about body parts (p < .001). More lenient recommended sanctions were observed among Year 1 students compared with other years, with the most significant difference (p < .001) observed for exchanging information about the exam, forging a signature, plagiarising and cut-pasting materials without acknowledgement.
Conclusion: The majority of academic lapses were well comprehended. Significant differences were observed in sanctions imposed in terms of gender and year of study.
Keywords: academic dishonesty; dental education; dental professionalism; professionalism lapse.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Zijlstra-Shaw S, Robinson PG, Roberts T. Assessing professionalism within dental education; the need for a definition. Eur J Dent Educ. 2012;16(1):e128-e136.
-
- Alcota M, Ruiz-de Gauna P, González F. Professionalism in dental education. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2016;28(1):158-157.
-
- Salam A, Song CO, Mazlan NF, Hassin H, Lee LS, Abdullah MH. A pilot study on professionalism of future medical professionals in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) medical Centre. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2012;60:534e40-540e40.
-
- American Board of Internal Medicine. Project Professionalism. American Board of Internal Medicine; 1994.
-
- American Dental Education Association ADEA. ADEA Statement on Professionalism in Dental Education As Approved by the 2009 ADEA House of Delegates [internet]. (3.2.5)-ADEA-Statement-on-Professionalism-in-Dental-Education.pdf; 2009.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources