Costo-utilità di dalbavancina versus standard of care (SoC) in pazienti con ABSSSI non severa in Italia
- PMID: 36627961
- PMCID: PMC9677603
- DOI: 10.33393/grhta.2020.2138
Costo-utilità di dalbavancina versus standard of care (SoC) in pazienti con ABSSSI non severa in Italia
Abstract
Introduction:: Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSIs) include all complicated skin and soft tissue infections. The aim of this study was to conduct a cost-utility analysis to compare dalbavancin with standard antibiotic therapies for the management of non-severe ABSSSIs from the National Health Service (NHS) perspective.
Methods:: A probabilistic decision tree model was developed considering a 30-days follow-up to simulate the therapeutic pathway of a patient treated with dalbavancin or Standard of Care (SoC). The model considered three mutually exclusive health states: a) discharge of patients from the emergency department, b) discharge of patients after one night from admission, c) discharge after 24 or 36 hours from admission. A one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted.
Results:: The analysis showed that the use of dalbavancin in patients with non-severe ABSSSI compared to SoC could generate a reduction in costs (– € 291.6 per patient treated) and an increase in QALYs (+0.0018 per patient treated). In 99.7% of the simulations carried out, dalbavancin was dominant compared to the SoC. Considering a threshold for the willingness to pay of € 30,000 for QALY gained, the minimum level of efficacy of dalbavancin so that the treatment can be considered cost-effective compared to the SoC was equal to 69.4%.
Conclusions:: The analysis showed that dalbavancin may represent a cost-effective option compared to SoC for the treatment of patients with non-severe ABSSSI.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no conflict of interest related to the article.
Figures
References
-
- The United States Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Developing Drugs for Treatment. 2013 Online
-
- Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(2):e10–e52. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu296. Medline - DOI - PubMed
-
- Garau J, Ostermann H, Medina J et al. REACH study group. Current management of patients hospitalized with complicated skin and soft tissue infections across Europe (2010-2011): assessment of clinical practice patterns and real-life effectiveness of antibiotics from the REACH study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19(9):e377–e385. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12235. Medline - DOI - PubMed
-
- Esposito S, Bassetti M, Concia E et al. Italian Society of Infectious and Tropical Diseases. Diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTI). A literature review and consensus statement: an update. J Chemother. 2017;29(4):197–214. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2017.1311398. Medline - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources