Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun 28;9(Suppl 2):14-19.
doi: 10.33393/grhta.2022.2420. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

New evidence in adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures in adults: a critical appraisal

Affiliations
Review

New evidence in adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures in adults: a critical appraisal

Simona Lattanzi. Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. .

Abstract

Anti-seizure medications (ASMs) represent the pillar of the treatment of epilepsy. The rate of drug-resistant epilepsy remained substantially unchanged over time and there is still the need for new and more effective treatment options. Brivaracetam, cenobamate, eslicarbazepine acetate, lacosamide and perampanel are 'third-generation' ASMs. The aim of this article is to summarize the currently available evidence about the relative efficacy and tolerability of the 'third-generation' ASMs as adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures in adults. So far, no randomized controlled study directly compared these ASMs, and their comparative efficacy and tolerability have been indirectly evaluated by one network meta-analysis. Sixteen trials were included in the network meta-analysis. The efficacy endpoints were the rates of seizure response and seizure freedom, defined as ≥ 50% and 100% reduction in baseline monthly seizure frequency. The tolerability endpoints were the rate of patients who developed any treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and any TEAE leading to drug discontinuation. Cenobamate had the greatest likelihood of being the best option for the ≥ 50% and 100% seizure frequency reduction. Brivaracetam and lacosamide had the greatest likelihood to rank as the best-tolerated treatments for the occurrence of any TEAE and TEAE leading to discontinuation. Although network meta-analyses are not substitutes of direct comparisons, they can provide valuable evidence about the hierarchy of interventions. Additional real-world data can be useful complement to characterize the clinical profile and therapeutic potentialities of third-generation ASMs.

Keywords: Anti-seizure medications; Epilepsy; Focal seizures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: SL has received speaker’s or consultancy fees from Angelini Pharma, Eisai, GW Pharmaceuticals, and UCB Pharma and has served on advisory boards for Angelini Pharma, Arvelle Therapeutics, BIAL, and GW Pharmaceuticals.

Figures

Fig. 1 -
Fig. 1 -
Interval plot for the seizure response outcome. BRV = brivaracetam; CI = confidence interval; CNB = cenobamate; ESL = eslicarbazepine acetate; LCM = lacosamide; PBO = placebo; PER = perampanel.
Fig. 2 -
Fig. 2 -
Interval plot for the seizure freedom outcome. BRV = brivaracetam; CI = confidence interval; CNB = cenobamate; ESL = eslicarbazepine acetate; LCM = lacosamide; PBO = placebo; PER = perampanel.
Fig. 3 -
Fig. 3 -
Interval plot for the occurrence of at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. BRV = brivaracetam; CI = confidence interval; CNB = cenobamate; ESL = eslicarbazepine acetate; LCM = lacosamide; PBO = placebo; PER = perampanel.
Fig. 4 -
Fig. 4 -
Interval plot for the occurrence of at least one treatment-emergent adverse event leading to discontinuation. BRV = brivaracetam; CI = confidence interval; CNB = cenobamate; ESL = eslicarbazepine acetate; LCM = lacosamide; PBO = placebo; PER = perampanel.

References

    1. Banerjee PN, Filippi D, Allen Hauser W. The descriptive epidemiology of epilepsy – a review. Epilepsy Res. 2009;85(1):31–45. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2009.03.003. PubMed - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hirtz D, Thurman DJ, Gwinn-Hardy K, Mohamed M, Chaudhuri AR, Zalutsky R. How common are the ‘common’ neurologic disorders? Neurology. 2007;68(5):326–337. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000252807.38124.a3. PubMed - DOI - PubMed
    1. Josephson CB, Patten SB, Bulloch A et al. The impact of seizures on epilepsy outcomes: a national, community-based survey. Epilepsia. 2017;58(5):764–771. doi: 10.1111/epi.13723. PubMed - DOI - PubMed
    1. Laxer KD, Trinka E, Hirsch LJ et al. The consequences of refractory epilepsy and its treatment. Epilepsy Behav. 2014;37:59–70. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.05.031. PubMed - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cockerell OC, Johnson AL, Sander JW, Hart YM, Shorvon SD. Remission of epilepsy: results from the national general practice study of epilepsy. Lancet. 1995;346(8968):140–144. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91208-8. PubMed - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources