Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May;93(5):1335-1340.
doi: 10.1111/ans.18239. Epub 2023 Jan 11.

Anterolateral thigh, radial forearm and superficial circumflex iliac perforator flaps in oral reconstruction: a comparative analysis

Michael John Papanikolas  1 , Michael James Leslie Hurrell  1 , Jonathan R Clark  1   2   3 , Tsu-Hui Hubert Low  1   2 , Sydney Ch'ng  1   2   3 , Michael S Elliott  1   2   3 , Carsten E Palme  1   2 , James Wykes  1   2
Affiliations
Review

Anterolateral thigh, radial forearm and superficial circumflex iliac perforator flaps in oral reconstruction: a comparative analysis

Michael John Papanikolas et al. ANZ J Surg. 2023 May.

Abstract

Background: Anterolateral thigh (ALT) and Radial forearm free flaps (RFFF) are historically the most common methods of oral reconstruction. The Superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap (SCIP) is an alternative providing a donor site that can be readily closed primarily with improved cosmesis in younger patients, due to its concealability.

Methods: We reviewed 135 patients who received ALT, RFFF or SCIP flaps for oral reconstruction in our institution. Our aim was to compare operative and perioperative outcomes between each cohort. ANOVA and χ2 test were used for statistical analysis.

Results: There were 37 ALT, 64 RFFF and 35 SCIP reconstructions. Patients reconstructed with SCIP flaps had smaller resection volumes (P < 0.001) and earlier T and N classifications (P = 0.001, P = 0.008), and consequently reduced tracheostomy rates (P < 0.001), reduced need for enteral feeding at discharge (P < 0.001) and shorter length of stay and perioperative times (P < 0.001). SCIP flaps were more common in younger patients (P < 0.01). ALT flaps were used for more advanced disease (P = 0.001) and had larger resection volumes (P < 0.001) and increased need for assisted enteral feeding (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in flap or donor site outcomes. There were two flap failures, both RFFF.

Conclusion: Each flap plays an important role in the reconstruction of oral defects, with larger defects preferentially reconstructed with ALT flaps. SCIP appears to be a reliable alternative in small defects with excellent perioperative and postoperative outcomes.

Keywords: free flap; tongue reconstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Omura K. Current status of oral cancer treatment strategies: surgical treatments for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014; 19: 423-30.
    1. Hanasono MM. Reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancer patients. Advances in Medicine. Hindawi, doi: 10.1155/2014/795483
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2021. Cancer in Australia 2021. Cancer series no.133. Cat. No. CAN 144. Canberra: AIHW.
    1. Satgunaseelan L, Allanson BM, Asher R et al. The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue is rising in young non-smoking women: an international multi-institutional analysis. Oral Oncol. 2020; 110: 110.
    1. Bhattacharya S, Thankappan K, Joseph ST et al. Volume and location of the defect as predictors of swallowing outcome after glossectomy: correlation with a classification. Dysphagia 2021; 36: 974-83.

LinkOut - more resources