Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 1;44(9):713-725.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac758.

Artificial intelligence to enhance clinical value across the spectrum of cardiovascular healthcare

Collaborators, Affiliations

Artificial intelligence to enhance clinical value across the spectrum of cardiovascular healthcare

Simrat K Gill et al. Eur Heart J. .

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being utilized in healthcare. This article provides clinicians and researchers with a step-wise foundation for high-value AI that can be applied to a variety of different data modalities. The aim is to improve the transparency and application of AI methods, with the potential to benefit patients in routine cardiovascular care. Following a clear research hypothesis, an AI-based workflow begins with data selection and pre-processing prior to analysis, with the type of data (structured, semi-structured, or unstructured) determining what type of pre-processing steps and machine-learning algorithms are required. Algorithmic and data validation should be performed to ensure the robustness of the chosen methodology, followed by an objective evaluation of performance. Seven case studies are provided to highlight the wide variety of data modalities and clinical questions that can benefit from modern AI techniques, with a focus on applying them to cardiovascular disease management. Despite the growing use of AI, further education for healthcare workers, researchers, and the public are needed to aid understanding of how AI works and to close the existing gap in knowledge. In addition, issues regarding data access, sharing, and security must be addressed to ensure full engagement by patients and the public. The application of AI within healthcare provides an opportunity for clinicians to deliver a more personalized approach to medical care by accounting for confounders, interactions, and the rising prevalence of multi-morbidity.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Healthcare; Management; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf) and declare: S.K.G. reports funding through the BigData@Heart Innovative Medicines Initiative [grant no. 116074]. A.B. reports funding from the BigData@Heart Innovative Medicines Initiative [grant no. 116074] during the conduct of the study. L.S. reports grants from HDR UK (HDRUK/CFC/01); grants from Nanocommons (731 032), during the conduct of the study; grants from Wellcome Trust, outside the submitted work. J.D. reports grants from BHF Accelerator Award, during the conduct of the study (AA/18/2/34218); and a patent method for detecting adverse cardiac events pending. D.E.G. is the academic lead of EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative BigData@Heart [grant no. 116074]. G.G. reports support from the NIHR Birmingham ECMC, NIHR Birmingham SRMRC, Nanocommons H2020-EU (731032) and the MRC Heath Data Research UK (HDRUK/CFC/01). D.K. reports grants from EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative (BigData@Heart 116074), during the conduct of the study; grants from National Institute for Health Research (NIHR CDF-2015-08-074 RATE-AF; NIHR130280 DaRe2THINK; NIHR132974 D2T-NeuroVascular); grants from British Heart Foundation (PG/17/55/33087, AA/18/2/34218 and FS/CDRF/21/21032); grants from European Society of Cardiology supported by educational grants from Boehringer Ingelheim/BMS-Pfizer Alliance/Bayer/Daiichi Sankyo/Boston Scientific, the NIHR/University of Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and British Heart Foundation/University of Birmingham Accelerator Award (STEEER-AF NCT04396418); grants from Amomed Pharma, Protherics Medicines Development and IRCCS San Raffaele/Menarini (Beta-blockers in Heart Failure Collaborative Group NCT0083244); and advisory board personal fees from Bayer, Amomed, Protherics Medicines Development and Myokardia; all outside the submitted work. A.K., H.W.U., V.R.C., Z.G., A.A., M.S., S.H., L.D.O., S.B., S.C., F.W.A., and M.J.C.E. have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Step-wise workflow to improve the value of artificial intelligence in clinical research. AI, artificial intelligence.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Artificial intelligence framework for clinical application. An overview of a framework to apply artificial intelligence, with standardized assessment and reporting of data acquisition, data pre-processing, and machine learning. These steps are interlinked with evaluation and validation to provide clinical value in real-world applications
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of analytic steps based on data modality. Examples of pre-processing and machine-learning approaches based on the type of data available. CNN, convolutional neural network; DNN, deep neural network; LSTM, long short-term memory recurrent network; O2PLS, orthogonal two-way PLS; PCA, principal component analysis; PLS, partial least squares regression; SVM, support vector machine
Figure 3
Figure 3
Case studies on how to improve phenotyping of patients. (A) Case study 1 using an artificial intelligence pipeline to cluster patients across nine clinical trials in patients with heart failure, reduced ejection fraction, and concomitant atrial fibrillation. Circles represent the average mortality risk (size relative to the number of patients in that cluster), with odds ratios for the efficacy of beta-blockers vs. placebo for all-cause mortality, and radar plots summarizing descriptors for each cluster compared with the cohort average (open orange circles at the centre of each radar plot). Reproduced and amended from. (B) Case study 2 showing the gene–gene interaction network of the top genes based on integrating transcriptomics and inflammation markers in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis-inflammatory bowel disease and ulcerative colitis, externally validating the group sparse two-way orthogonal partial least squares approach. (C) Case study 4 depicting receiver operating characteristic curves for incident heart failure prediction in routine clinical practice, demonstrating superiority of the deep neural network model derived from digital electrocardiograms compared with clinical parameters (P < 0.00001). AF, atrial fibrillation; ECG, electrocardiogram; EHR, electronic healthcare records
Figure 4
Figure 4
Case studies on how to incorporate novel investigations. (A) Case study 5 demonstrating ambulatory time-series data obtained from consumer wearable devices in two patients with atrial fibrillation. The blue line indicates minute-to-minute heart rate, in relation to the orange bars showing physical activity measured by step count over a 24 h period. Both patients had permanent atrial fibrillation and heart failure, the same level of symptoms (New York Heart Association Class III) and were treated with optimal medical therapy including heart rate control at the time of data capture (from the RATE-AF clinical trial). (B) Case study 6 showing the pipeline for signal processing of photoplethysmography signals using a smartphone camera, using deep learning (convolutional neural networks on pre-processed signals) and machine learning (features ranking and support vector machine on standardized features) to obtain clean signals for analysis and prediction of vascular ageing. (C) Case study 7 using dynamic neural network segmentation of volumetric cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to train a denoising autoencoder for stratification of survival in patients with pulmonary hypertension. AF, atrial fibrillation; CNN, convolutional neural network; HF, heart failure; PPG, photoplethysmography.

References

    1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. . Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380:2095–2128. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tran J, Norton R, Conrad N, Rahimian F, Canoy D, Nazarzadeh M, et al. . Patterns and temporal trends of comorbidity among adult patients with incident cardiovascular disease in the UK between 2000 and 2014: a population-based cohort study. PLoS Med 2018;15:e1002513. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002513. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karwath A, Bunting KV, Gill SK, Tica O, Pendleton S, Aziz F, et al. . Redefining beta-blocker response in heart failure patients with sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation: a machine learning cluster analysis. Lancet 2021;398:1427–1435. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01638-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hemingway H, Asselbergs FW, Danesh J, Dobson R, Maniadakis N, Maggioni A, et al. . Big data from electronic health records for early and late translational cardiovascular research: challenges and potential. Eur Heart J 2018;39:1481–1495. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx487. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rumsfeld JS, Joynt KE, Maddox TM. Big data analytics to improve cardiovascular care: promise and challenges. Nat Rev Cardiol 2016;13:350–359. 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.42. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types