Measurement of Vital Signs by Lifelight Software in Comparison to Standard of Care Multisite Development (VISION-MD): Protocol for an Observational Study
- PMID: 36630158
- PMCID: PMC9878372
- DOI: 10.2196/41533
Measurement of Vital Signs by Lifelight Software in Comparison to Standard of Care Multisite Development (VISION-MD): Protocol for an Observational Study
Abstract
Background: Measuring vital signs (VS) is an important aspect of clinical care but is time-consuming and requires multiple pieces of equipment and trained staff. Interest in the contactless measurement of VS has grown since the COVID-19 pandemic, including in nonclinical situations. Lifelight is an app being developed as a medical device for the contactless measurement of VS using remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) via the camera on smart devices. The VISION-D (Measurement of Vital Signs by Lifelight Software in Comparison to the Standard of Care-Development) and VISION-V (Validation) studies demonstrated the accuracy of Lifelight compared with standard-of-care measurement of blood pressure, pulse rate, and respiratory rate, supporting the certification of Lifelight as a class I Conformité Européenne (CE) medical device.
Objective: To support further development of the Lifelight app, the observational VISION Multisite Development (VISION-MD) study is collecting high-quality data from a broad range of patients, including those with VS measurements outside the normal healthy range and patients who are critically ill.
Methods: The study is recruiting adults (aged ≥16 years) who are inpatients (some critically ill), outpatients, and healthy volunteers, aiming to cover a broad range of normal and clinically relevant VS values; there are no exclusion criteria. High-resolution 60-second videos of the face are recorded by the Lifelight app while simultaneously measuring VS using standard-of-care methods (automated sphygmomanometer for blood pressure; finger clip sensor for pulse rate and oxygen saturation; manual counting of respiratory rate). Feedback from patients and nurses who use Lifelight is collected via a questionnaire. Data to estimate the cost-effectiveness of Lifelight compared with standard-of-care VS measurement are also being collected. A new method for rPPG signal processing is currently being developed, based on the identification of small areas of high-quality signals in each individual. Anticipated recruitment is 1950 participants, with the expectation that data from approximately 1700 will be used for software development. Data from 250 participants will be retained to test the performance of Lifelight against predefined performance targets.
Results: Recruitment began in May 2021 but was hindered by the restrictions instigated during the COVID-19 pandemic. The development of data processing methodology is in progress. The data for analysis will become available from September 2022, and the algorithms will be refined continuously to improve clinical accuracy. The performance of Lifelight compared with that of the standard-of-care measurement of VS will then be tested. Recruitment will resume if further data are required. The analyses are expected to be completed in early 2023.
Conclusions: This study will support the refinement of data collection and processing toward the development of a robust app that is suitable for routine clinical use.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04763746; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04763746.
International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/41533.
Keywords: Lifelight; contactless; general practice; photoplethysmography; rPPG; remote photoplethysmography; software; vital signs/methods; vital signs/standards.
©Laura Wiffen, Thomas Brown, Annika Brogaard Maczka, Melissa Kapoor, Laurence Pearce, Milan Chauhan, Anoop J Chauhan, Manish Saxena, Lifelight Trials Group. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 11.01.2023.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: LP is the Founder of Xim Ltd and is a major shareholder in the company.
Similar articles
-
Dynamic Region of Interest Selection in Remote Photoplethysmography: Proof-of-Concept Study.JMIR Form Res. 2023 Mar 30;7:e44575. doi: 10.2196/44575. JMIR Form Res. 2023. PMID: 36995742 Free PMC article.
-
The Measurement of Vital Signs in Pediatric Patients by Lifelight Software in Comparison to the Standard of Care: Protocol for the VISION-Junior Observational Study.JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Mar 14;14:e58334. doi: 10.2196/58334. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025. PMID: 40085833 Free PMC article.
-
Measurement of Vital Signs Using Lifelight Remote Photoplethysmography: Results of the VISION-D and VISION-V Observational Studies.JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 14;6(11):e36340. doi: 10.2196/36340. JMIR Form Res. 2022. PMID: 36374541 Free PMC article.
-
Deep learning and remote photoplethysmography powered advancements in contactless physiological measurement.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Jul 17;12:1420100. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1420100. eCollection 2024. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024. PMID: 39104628 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Contactless Vital Signs Monitoring From Videos Recorded With Digital Cameras: An Overview.Front Physiol. 2022 Feb 18;13:801709. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.801709. eCollection 2022. Front Physiol. 2022. PMID: 35250612 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Dynamic Region of Interest Selection in Remote Photoplethysmography: Proof-of-Concept Study.JMIR Form Res. 2023 Mar 30;7:e44575. doi: 10.2196/44575. JMIR Form Res. 2023. PMID: 36995742 Free PMC article.
-
An intelligent telemonitoring application for coronavirus patients: reCOVeryaID.Front Big Data. 2023 Sep 18;6:1205766. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2023.1205766. eCollection 2023. Front Big Data. 2023. PMID: 37790086 Free PMC article.
-
Non-Contact Vision-Based Techniques of Vital Sign Monitoring: Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 19;24(12):3963. doi: 10.3390/s24123963. Sensors (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38931747 Free PMC article.
-
Technologies and main functionalities of the telemonitoring application reCOVeryaID.Front Big Data. 2024 Jul 22;7:1360092. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2024.1360092. eCollection 2024. Front Big Data. 2024. PMID: 39104732 Free PMC article.
-
The Measurement of Vital Signs in Pediatric Patients by Lifelight Software in Comparison to the Standard of Care: Protocol for the VISION-Junior Observational Study.JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Mar 14;14:e58334. doi: 10.2196/58334. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025. PMID: 40085833 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Buist MD, Jarmolowski E, Burton PR, Bernard SA, Waxman BP, Anderson J. Recognising clinical instability in hospital patients before cardiac arrest or unplanned admission to intensive care. A pilot study in a tertiary-care hospital. Med J Aust. 1999 Jul 05;171(1):22–25. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1999.tb123492.x. - DOI - PubMed
-
- van Leuvan CH, Mitchell I. Missed opportunities? An observational study of vital sign measurements. Crit Care Resusc. 2008 Jun;10(2):111–115. - PubMed
-
- Ludikhuize J, Smorenburg SM, de Rooij SE, de Jonge E. Identification of deteriorating patients on general wards; measurement of vital parameters and potential effectiveness of the Modified Early Warning Score. J Crit Care. 2012 Aug;27(4):424.e7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.01.003.S0883-9441(12)00016-0 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Flacco ME, Manzoli L, Bucci M, Capasso L, Comparcini D, Simonetti V, Gualano MR, Nocciolini M, D'Amario C, Cicolini G. Uneven accuracy of home blood pressure measurement: a multicentric survey. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2015 Aug;17(8):638–643. doi: 10.1111/jch.12552. doi: 10.1111/jch.12552. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical