Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Jan 11:25:e37867.
doi: 10.2196/37867.

Mailed Letter Versus Phone Call to Increase Diabetic-Related Retinopathy Screening Engagement by Patients in a Team-Based Primary Care Practice: Prospective, Single-Masked, Randomized Trial

Vess Stamenova  1 , Megan Nguyen  1 , Nike Onabajo  1 , Rebecca Merritt  2 , Olivera Sutakovic  3 , Kathryn Mossman  1 , Ivy Wong  1 , Lori Ives-Baine  4 , R Sacha Bhatia  1 , Michael H Brent  3   5 , Onil Bhattacharyya  1   6
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Mailed Letter Versus Phone Call to Increase Diabetic-Related Retinopathy Screening Engagement by Patients in a Team-Based Primary Care Practice: Prospective, Single-Masked, Randomized Trial

Vess Stamenova et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Vision loss from diabetic-related retinopathy (DR) is preventable through regular screening.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to test different patient engagement approaches to expand a teleophthalmology program at a primary care clinic in the city of Toronto, Canada.

Methods: A teleophthalmology program was set up in a large, urban, academic, team-based primary care practice. Patients older than 18 years with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were randomized to one of the following 4 engagement strategies: phone call, mail, mail plus phone call, or usual care. Outreach was conducted by administrative staff within the clinic. The primary outcome was booking an appointment for DR screening.

Results: A total of 23 patients in the phone, 28 in the mail, 32 in the mail plus phone call, and 27 in the control (usual care) group were included in the analysis. After the intervention and after excluding patients who said they were screened, 88% (15/17) of patients in the phone, 11% (2/18) in the mail, and 100% (21/21) in the mail and phone group booked an appointment with the teleophthalmology program compared to 0% (0/12) in the control group. Phoning patients positively predicted patients booking a teleophthalmology appointment (P<.001), whereas mailing a letter had no effect.

Conclusions: Patient engagement to book DR screening via teleophthalmology in an urban, academic, team-based primary care practice using telephone calls was much more effective than patient engagement using letters or usual care. Practices that have access to a local DR screening program and have resources for such engagement strategies should consider using them as a means to improve their DR screening rates.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03927859; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03927859.

Keywords: Canada; diabetes; diabetic-related retinopathy; patient; primary care; screening; teleophthalmology; vision loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram showing patients flow through the study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cheung N, Mitchell P, Wong TY. Diabetic retinopathy. Lancet. 2010 Jul;376(9735):124–136. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)62124-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee R, Wong TY, Sabanayagam C. Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema and related vision loss. Eye Vis (Lond) 2015 Sep 30;2(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40662-015-0026-2. https://eandv.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40662-015-0026-2 26 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Solomon SD, Chew E, Duh EJ, Sobrin L, Sun JK, VanderBeek BL, Wykoff CC, Gardner TW. Erratum. Diabetic retinopathy: a position statement by the American diabetes association. Diabetes care 2017;40:412-418. Diabetes Care. 2017 Sep 13;40(9):1285. doi: 10.2337/dc17-er09. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28705833 dc17-er09 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hooper P, Boucher MC, Cruess A, Dawson KG, Delpero W, Greve M, Kozousek V, Lam W, Maberley DA. Excerpt from the Canadian Ophthalmological Society evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of diabetic retinopathy. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov;52 Suppl 1:S45–S74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.09.027.S0008-4182(17)31047-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ballios B, Park T, Chaudhary V, Hurley B, Kosar S, Sheidow T, Cruess A, Brent M, Glazier R, Wong D. Identifying gaps in patient access to diabetic screening eye examinations in Ontario: a provincially representative cross-sectional study. Can J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;56(4):223–230. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2020.10.018.S0008-4182(20)30788-2 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data