Gynaecological pathologies leading to emergency department admissions: A cross-sectional study
- PMID: 36630817
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.01.006
Gynaecological pathologies leading to emergency department admissions: A cross-sectional study
Abstract
Objective: Knowing the population's needs in order to plan measures to reduce emergency department (ED) use is fundamental. The objective of this study was to describe gynaecological ED visits and associated findings in women of reproductive age.
Methods: This study was a retrospective anonymized chart review analysis of visits to the ED for gynaecological disturbances at the University Hospital of Modena. All consecutive women of reproductive age were included. Women aged <18 years and postmenopausal women were excluded from this study.
Results: In total, 461 records were analysed. The median age was 41 (interquartile range 34-46) years. The most common symptom was dysmenorrhoea (42.7 %), followed by heavy menstrual bleeding (33.2 %). The most common gynaecological findings in the ED were adenomyosis (86.1 %), endometriosis (37.1 %) and leiomyomas (13.7 %). Adenomyosis was the most common finding, regardless of age. Endometriosis was more prevalent in women aged <41 years (43.8 % vs 31.2 %; p < 0.05). Meanwhile, adenomyosis and leiomyomas were more prevalent in women aged ≥41 years (81.11 % vs 90.57 % and 7.37 % vs 19.26 %, respectively; p < 0.05). Moreover, potentially life-threatening findings had low prevalence [i.e. haemorrhagic ovarian cyst (0.2 %), tubo-ovarian abscess (0.2 %) and pelvic inflammatory disease (0.4 %)].
Conclusion: In the study setting, chronic pathologies such as adenomyosis, endometriosis and leiomyomas significantly impacted use of the ED. Adenomyosis was the most common pathology, regardless of age. Adenomyosis and leiomyomas were more prevalent in women aged ≥41 years, and endometriosis was more prevalent in women aged <41 years.
Keywords: Adenomyosis; Dysmenorrhoea; Emergency department; Endometriosis; Heavy menstrual bleeding; Leiomyomas; Pelvic pain.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Histological evaluation of the prevalence of adenomyosis, myomas and of their concomitance.Minerva Ginecol. 2019 Jun;71(3):177-181. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04291-0. Epub 2018 Nov 27. Minerva Ginecol. 2019. PMID: 30486633
-
Clinical characteristics indicating adenomyosis coexisting with leiomyomas: a retrospective, questionnaire-based study.Fertil Steril. 2014 Jan;101(1):237-241.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.038. Epub 2013 Nov 1. Fertil Steril. 2014. PMID: 24188881
-
Risk factors for adenomyosis in patients with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas.Ginekol Pol. 2010 Sep;81(9):678-80. Ginekol Pol. 2010. PMID: 20968175
-
Adenomyosis: a retrospective view.J Natl Med Assoc. 1989 Sep;81(9):969-72. J Natl Med Assoc. 1989. PMID: 2674465 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Benign myometrial conditions: leiomyomas and adenomyosis.Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Aug;14(4):281-304. doi: 10.1097/00002142-200308000-00003. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2003. PMID: 14578775 Review.
Cited by
-
Gut Microbiota and Endometriosis: Exploring the Relationship and Therapeutic Implications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Dec 7;16(12):1696. doi: 10.3390/ph16121696. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38139822 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advances in Adenomyosis Treatment: High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound, Percutaneous Microwave Therapy, and Radiofrequency Ablation.J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 29;13(19):5828. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195828. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39407887 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical