Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep;80(4):351-361.
doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12794. Epub 2023 Jan 11.

Informing online professional dietetics practice: The development and pilot testing of the Social Media Evaluation Checklist

Affiliations
Review

Informing online professional dietetics practice: The development and pilot testing of the Social Media Evaluation Checklist

Kelly Squires et al. Nutr Diet. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Aim: To develop and pilot a tool to evaluate Australian dietitians' and student dietitians' ethical and professional practice using social media.

Methods: A Social Media Evaluation Checklist was developed based on checklist development literature with a four-staged process. Stage one included a literature review and input from an expert panel to ensure content validity. Stages two and three were to ensure face validity by categorising the checklist and pilot testing the tool. Instagram profiles and posts were audited by two authors using the checklist in the final stage to analyse ethical and professional use. An account purposely created for this study was used, and the first 25 dietitian and first 25 student dietitian profiles identified using the key words 'dietitian', 'student dietitian' and 'dietitian student' and the hashtag '#australiandietitian' were reviewed.

Results: A total of 50 Instagram profiles and 250 posts were audited based on seven categories; (1) financial disclosure, (2) cultural awareness, (3) evidence-based information, (4) transparency, (5) privacy/confidentiality, (6) professionalism and (7) justifiability. Areas for improvement included advertising transparency which was met in only 12% of dietitian posts, and the provision of evidence-based information, which was met in 56% of dietitian posts and 72% of student dietitian posts.

Conclusions: This study provides insight into the ethical and professional use of social media by Australian dietitians and dietetics students. With the evolving nature of social media, guidance is required. This will ensure dietitians remain, now and in the future, the credible source of nutrition information for the public.

Keywords: checklist; dietetics; evidence-based practice; professionalism; social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Dietitians Association of Australia. Dialling into the digital age: Guidance on social media for DAA members. Deakin, ACT2014.
    1. Saboia I, Almeida AMP, Sousa P, Pernencar C, Silva R. What are dietitians and nutritionists doing on social media? A proposal of an online survey. Proc Comput Sci. 2021;181:793-802.
    1. Appetite Communications, Dietitian Connection. A 'Healthy Diet' of Social Media: trends in dietitians' Social Media Habits; 2018.
    1. Probst YC, Peng Q. Social media in dietetics: insights into use and user networks. Nutr Diet. 2019;76:414-420.
    1. Chen J, Wang Y. Social media use for health purposes: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23:e17917.

LinkOut - more resources