Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 11;13(1):576.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27768-0.

Diversity of binary toxin positive Clostridioides difficile in Korea

Affiliations

Diversity of binary toxin positive Clostridioides difficile in Korea

Jieun Kim et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine the trend and diversity of binary toxin-positive Clostridioides difficile over 10 years in Korea. Binary toxin-positive strains were selected from a tertiary hospital in Korea in 2009-2018. The multi-locus sequence typing and antibiotic susceptibility test were performed. Among the 3278 isolates in 2009-2018, 58 possessed binary toxin genes (1.7%). The proportion of CDT- positive isolates was 0.51-4.82% in 2009-2018, which increased over the 10-year period (P = 0.023). Thirteen sequence types (STs) were identified; ST5 (14 [24%]), ST11 (11 [19%]), ST221 (10 [17%]), ST201 (7 [12%]) and ST1 (5 [9%]) were popular. All 58 isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam, and clindamycin and moxifloxacin were active in 69.0% and 62% of isolates, respectively. ST1 strains were resistant to several antibiotics, including moxifloxacin (80%), clindamycin (60%) and rifaximin (60%). Moreover, four of five ST1 presented a metronidazole minimum inhibitory concentration of 4 µg/mL. Moxifloxacin resistance was highest (72.3%) for ST11. In conclusion, binary toxin-positive strains are non-prevalent in Korea and involve diverse STs. ST1 strains were resistant to several antibiotics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Annual percentage of binary toxin-positive Clostridioides difficile among all the isolates by year.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of (A) sequence types (ST) and (B) clades by year, 2009–2018.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Neighbor-joining tree constructed using the concatenated sequences of the seven loci used in multi-locus sequence typing. Bootstraps were generated using 1000 replicates, and low values were removed for clarity. Sequence types (STs) are shown as numbers. The STs cluster into four groups, designated 2, 3, 5 and unknown.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McDonald LC, et al. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;353:2433–2441. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051590. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gerding DN, Johnson S, Rupnik M, Aktories K. Clostridium difficile binary toxin CDT: Mechanism, epidemiology, and potential clinical importance. Gut. Microbes. 2014;5:15–27. doi: 10.4161/gmic.26854. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goorhuis A, et al. Emergence of Clostridium difficile infection due to a new hypervirulent strain, polymerase chain reaction ribotype 078. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008;47:1162–1170. doi: 10.1086/592257. - DOI - PubMed
    1. See I, et al. NAP1 strain type predicts outcomes from Clostridium difficile infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014;58:1394–1400. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu125. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stubbs S, et al. Production of actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase (binary toxin) by strains of Clostridium difficile. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2000;186:307–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09122.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources