Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Jan 12;23(1):21.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03974-8.

Can educational video resources improve learning when used to augment traditional teaching of clinical examination? A randomized control trial of novice medical students

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Can educational video resources improve learning when used to augment traditional teaching of clinical examination? A randomized control trial of novice medical students

Ellie Flatt et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Good clinical examination skills can both increase the quality of patient care and reduce its cost. A previous study by our group demonstrated that face-to-face training is the gold standard for teaching these skills. It is unclear if high quality educational videos can augment this teaching.

Methods: Forty-two Medical Students naïve to large joint examination were recruited and block randomised to two groups. The control group had face-to-face teaching alone. The intervention group had their teaching augmented with a custom educational video accessed via a web portal. Participants were assessed on their examination of a large joint using a previously standardised assessment tool at baseline and 7 days post intervention. Assessors were blinded to intervention type.

Results: There was no significant difference in the mean baseline scores. Mean baseline scores were 3.35 (11.2%, SD = 2.2, SE = 0.49) for the face-to-face only group and 2.65 (8.8%, SD = 1.39, SE = 0.31) for the video adjunct group [p = 0.137]. There was a significant difference in the improvement in score after intervention between each group [p = 0.005]. The mean improvement in score was 15.42 (SD = 5.64, SE = 1.29) for the face-to-face only group and 20.68 (SD = 4.33,SE = 0.99) for the video adjunct group.

Conclusion: When used as an adjunct to more traditional face-to-face teaching methods, a custom-made educational video significantly improves the teaching of clinical examination skills and there is a role for these resources in augmenting traditional teaching methods.

Keywords: Distance learning; Educational technology; Medical education; Physical examination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consort flow diagram showing trial recruitment and retention
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pre- and post-intervention assessment scores for each of the training groups. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Play rate of the video resource by date for the video adjunct cohort

References

    1. Danielson AR, Venugopal S, Mefford JM, Clarke SO. How do novices learn physical examination skills? A systematic review of the literature. Medical education online. 2019;24:1608142. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1608142. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Craige E. Should auscultation be rehabilitated? N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1611–1613. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198806163182409. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bergl P, Farnan J, Chan E. Moving toward cost-effectiveness in physical examination. Am J Med. 2015;128:109–110. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.10.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oswald A, Bell M, Snell L, Wiseman J. The current state of musculoskeletal clinical skills teaching for preclerkship medical students. J Rheumatol. 2008;35(12):2419–2426. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080308. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peitzmann S, Cuddy M. Performance in physical examination on the USMLE step 2 clinical skills examination. Acad Med. 2015;90(2):209–213. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000570. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types