Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 May;50(5):604-626.
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13769. Epub 2023 Jan 20.

Prevalence of periodontitis in dentate people between 2011 and 2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prevalence of periodontitis in dentate people between 2011 and 2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies

Diogo Trindade et al. J Clin Periodontol. 2023 May.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of periodontitis in dentate people between 2011 and 2020.

Materials and methods: PUBMED, Web of Science, and LILACS were searched up to and including December 2021. Epidemiological studies reporting the prevalence of periodontitis conducted between 2011 and 2020 were eligible for inclusion in this review. Studies were grouped according to the case definition of confidence as confident (Centers for Disease Control [CDC] AAP 2012; CDC/AAP 2007; and Armitage 1999) and non-confident (community periodontal index of 3 or 4, periodontal pocket depth >4 mm, and clinical attachment level ≥1 mm). Random effects meta-analyses with double arcsine transformation were conducted. Sensitivity subgroup and meta-regression analyses explored the effect of confounding variables on the overall estimates.

Results: A total 55 studies were included. The results showed a significant difference, with confident case definitions (61.6%) reporting nearly twice the prevalence as non-confident classifications (38.5%). Estimates using confident periodontal case definitions showed a pooled prevalence of periodontitis of 61.6%, comprising 17 different countries. Estimates reporting using the CDC/AAP 2012 case definition presented the highest estimate (68.1%) and the CDC/AAP 2007 presented the lowest (48.8%). Age was a relevant confounding variable, as older participants (≥65 years) had the highest pooled estimate (79.3%).

Conclusion: Between 2011 and 2020, periodontitis in dentate adults was estimated to be around 62% and severe periodontitis 23.6%. These results show an unusually high prevalence of periodontitis compared to the previous estimates from 1990 to 2010.

Keywords: periodontal disease; periodontitis; prevalence; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Araya Vallespir, C., Ulloa Ortega, C., Luengo Machuca, L., Rodriguez Vera, M., & Contreras, S. S. (2014). Grado de concordancia de los índices más utilizados en estudios epidemiológicos de la enfermedad periodontal. Revista Clínica de Periodoncia, Implantología y Rehabilitación Oral., 7(3), 175-179.
    1. Armitage, G. C. (1999). Development of a classification system for periodontal diseases and conditions. Annals of Periodontology., 4(1), 1-6.
    1. Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health. (2019). Australias' Oral Health National Study of Adult Oral Health 2017-18. The University of Adelaide.
    1. Balaji, S., Lavu, V., & Rao, S. (2018). Chronic periodontitis prevalence and the inflammatory burden in a sample population from South India. Indian Journal of Dental Research, 29(2), 254.
    1. Barendregt, J. J., Doi, S. A., Lee, Y. Y., Norman, R. E., & Vos, T. (2013). Meta-analysis of prevalence. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 67(11), 974-978.

LinkOut - more resources